Currie did not know what his job was.
I never said I was 100% certain.
Ah, so its rumor and inuendo you are basing your claims off of. The amount of hate that some fans have for Fulmer is just laughable and sad.
Ive met him several times and had a family member play for him, and never once have we gotten any inkling of Fulmer being the Machiavellian, evil, conceited mastermind you (and others) are trying to paint him as.
Is he really the bad guy? Its been reported that Fulmer was sabotaging everything Currie tried to do and Im starting to think that was true.
Is it possible that Fulmer wanted to hire Schiano (it was said Peyton was supportive of this as well) and Currie made sure that didnt happen to try and save his job and please the fan base?
Currie then tried to hire Brohm and Leach (both of which the fan base would have approved of), and Fulmer torpedoed then because he wanted a defensive guy.
The UTAD then fires Currie and uses him as a scapegoat for their ineptitude, and let Fulmer Hire his defensive guy under the guise of having a UT blooded leader looking out for our best interests.
Seems to me that Currie went rogue and was trying to make a good hire and everyone in the admin opposed. For the record I would have taken Leach or Brohm over Pruitt. Both are proven head coaches and they would have torched the SEC EAST with elite offenses.
Flame on but I think Fulmer is the enemy and the fan base was duped again. Only time will tell.
Thank you for this prime example of Fulmer Felching. This is exactly what Foolmers do. If you criticize their fat idol, they accuse you of things like being a homosexual. Fulmer sabotaged the coaching search. It's a fact. He didn't want Mike Leach. Fulmer wanted a puppet he could control. No one controls Mike Leach. Fulmer was done if Leach came to UT. Done.
Is he really the bad guy? Its been reported that Fulmer was sabotaging everything Currie tried to do and Im starting to think that was true.
Is it possible that Fulmer wanted to hire Schiano (it was said Peyton was supportive of this as well) and Currie made sure that didnt happen to try and save his job and please the fan base?
Currie then tried to hire Brohm and Leach (both of which the fan base would have approved of), and Fulmer torpedoed then because he wanted a defensive guy.
The UTAD then fires Currie and uses him as a scapegoat for their ineptitude, and let Fulmer Hire his defensive guy under the guise of having a UT blooded leader looking out for our best interests.
Seems to me that Currie went rogue and was trying to make a good hire and everyone in the admin opposed. For the record I would have taken Leach or Brohm over Pruitt. Both are proven head coaches and they would have torched the SEC EAST with elite offenses.
Flame on but I think Fulmer is the enemy and the fan base was duped again. Only time will tell.
I'm curious how the Op knows with seemingly 100% certainty that Fulmer was diabolically sabotaging Currie behind the scenes. From what I've read, Fulmer wasn't even involved in the coaching search in any meaningful way until after Currie fubared the Brohm negotiations.
Currie was either in way over his head or didn't have the ability to blunt the wishes of Haslam. Either way, he didn't get the job done. Fulmer loves this university and secured Pruitt, as good an option as we could have hoped for under the circumstances.
Now let's just stop with the conspiracy theories and support this team and it's new leadership.
...Fulmer torpedoed then because he wanted a defensive guy.
...
Flame on but I think Fulmer is the enemy and the fan base was duped again. Only time will tell.
Cool guys. I get it, you all think Fulmer is the second coming. For the record I never said I disliked him ...
Is he really the bad guy? Its been reported that Fulmer was sabotaging everything Currie tried to do and Im starting to think that was true.
Is it possible that Fulmer wanted to hire Schiano (it was said Peyton was supportive of this as well) and Currie made sure that didnt happen to try and save his job and please the fan base?
Currie then tried to hire Brohm and Leach (both of which the fan base would have approved of), and Fulmer torpedoed then because he wanted a defensive guy.
The UTAD then fires Currie and uses him as a scapegoat for their ineptitude, and let Fulmer Hire his defensive guy under the guise of having a UT blooded leader looking out for our best interests.
Seems to me that Currie went rogue and was trying to make a good hire and everyone in the admin opposed. For the record I would have taken Leach or Brohm over Pruitt. Both are proven head coaches and they would have torched the SEC EAST with elite offenses.
Flame on but I think Fulmer is the enemy and the fan base was duped again. Only time will tell.
You guys are funny. I thought a messsage board was open for discussion on anything, but apparently if you dont share the same view point as everyone youre mobbed with posts about how dumb you are. This forum is turning into a place where zero discussion happens and everyone posts to please the crowd in hopes of receiving likes.
Cool guys. I get it, you all think Fulmer is the second coming. For the record I never said I disliked him or that I didnt support Pruitt.
However, I did say that I dont think Pruitt was the best hire UT could have gotten, but of course you all will defend it. Just like guys thought Dooley and Butch were great hires at the time. Pull up the threads.
Either way, mods feel free to delete this thread.
Is he really the bad guy? Its been reported that Fulmer was sabotaging everything Currie tried to do and Im starting to think that was true.
Is it possible that Fulmer wanted to hire Schiano (it was said Peyton was supportive of this as well) and Currie made sure that didnt happen to try and save his job and please the fan base?
Currie then tried to hire Brohm and Leach (both of which the fan base would have approved of), and Fulmer torpedoed then because he wanted a defensive guy.
The UTAD then fires Currie and uses him as a scapegoat for their ineptitude, and let Fulmer Hire his defensive guy under the guise of having a UT blooded leader looking out for our best interests.
Seems to me that Currie went rogue and was trying to make a good hire and everyone in the admin opposed. For the record I would have taken Leach or Brohm over Pruitt. Both are proven head coaches and they would have torched the SEC EAST with elite offenses.
Flame on but I think Fulmer is the enemy and the fan base was duped again. Only time will tell.
No, the middle two paragraphs are the meat of your issue. Only problem is, your beef has been stated 100 other ways on other threads. You fabricated this BS to go around it to get attention. Your only supporter is a Bama plant and D4H, I mean Volfan 10-4 or whatever his name is. Now, since you didn't get the support you want, you want to quit?
Wow! You would have taken Leach or Brohm over Pruitt! Why didnt the administration hire you over Fulmer?! They definitely overlooked your many years experience in leadership and building teams.
How are things at Bobs Transmission Repair?
I dont need a blue font.
Is he really the bad guy? Its been reported that Fulmer was sabotaging everything Currie tried to do and Im starting to think that was true.
Is it possible that Fulmer wanted to hire Schiano (it was said Peyton was supportive of this as well) and Currie made sure that didnt happen to try and save his job and please the fan base?
Currie then tried to hire Brohm and Leach (both of which the fan base would have approved of), and Fulmer torpedoed then because he wanted a defensive guy.
The UTAD then fires Currie and uses him as a scapegoat for their ineptitude, and let Fulmer Hire his defensive guy under the guise of having a UT blooded leader looking out for our best interests.
Seems to me that Currie went rogue and was trying to make a good hire and everyone in the admin opposed. For the record I would have taken Leach or Brohm over Pruitt. Both are proven head coaches and they would have torched the SEC EAST with elite offenses.
Flame on but I think Fulmer is the enemy and the fan base was duped again. Only time will tell.