patrick
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2003
- Messages
- 25,527
- Likes
- 20,492
Yes. But in the scenario you describe of trying to “run the numbers” to justify more money going to certain places, it’s going to be hard to run the numbers to justify giving the money to baseball (which is a multi-million dollar net negative) vs. women’s sports. Football is a different discussion when it is throwing off tens of millions every year — not everybody is going to agree with the argument, but it’s much easier to distinguish football from women’s bball than it is to distinguish baseball from women’s bball. And, importantly, women’s bball generates substantially more revenue than any other women’s sport, so sending money there is the way to make it look like you’re trying to be “equitable” as an athletic department.
You didn’t even read or comprehend my post. The numbers establish that baseball at TN lost about 3.5 million less than women’s basketball. Revenue is meaningless. Do your homework - google it - the are reports out there.
And further to the point that you fail to comprehend my post is about title IX. Truly title IX is about treating female and make college scholarship athletes the same. Revenue sharing is almost the exact opposite of that - TN paying football the lion’s share of revenue share is not equality, rather a reflection of the revenue generation.
It won’t take too long for some hungry class action lawyers blow that bs wide open. How the he’ll do you think the House settlement came about? It sure as hell did not come for the generosity of the NCAA.
I don’t play an attorney on TV and sure as hell don’t stay at holiday inns.
