Matt2496
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2016
- Messages
- 14,917
- Likes
- 24,244
So a GOP Senator whom is a former SEAL is on CNN yelling the quiet part out loud. Yes, this is absolutely about regime change. Or as he pointed out all of the reasons given are valid as is regime change they’ve been at this for about five decades and it’s a long list of grievances.
Oh… and oil![]()
Somehow the servers have persisted lol.And how is Reddit taking the last 48 hours?Have the servers melted?
Yeah, 2 entirely different scenarios. North Korea is driven by a single authoritarian with nothing to motivate his masses. Iran, with their Shiite brand of hardline Islam has millions of fanatics who would die for the opportunity to destroy Israel. The hope is that their are enough children and grandchildren of the Shah’s reign to foster the younger generation’s hunger for freedom like they had under the Shah. Pictures of Iran pre-revolution are amazing. They truly had a paradise with oil money flowing to the people, not to fanatical death squads.It's like I posted last night.
I don't know which poster said North Korea has the bomb and they haven't used it. The religious zealots of Iran would 100 percent use it on Isreal and if they get a ICBM the US and Europe.
Disagree. They don't want to be wiped off the face of the earth. They don't believe the **** they spew. They want power and money. Not deathIt's like I posted last night.
I don't know which poster said North Korea has the bomb and they haven't used it. The religious zealots of Iran would 100 percent use it on Isreal and if they get a ICBM the US and Europe.
Iran is made up of like 70m Shia Muslims, and I'm not sure assassinating a religious leader during Ramadan is a great way to gain support, but I could be wrong.Yeah, 2 entirely different scenarios. North Korea is driven by a single authoritarian with nothing to motivate his masses. Iran, with their Shiite brand of hardline Islam has millions of fanatics who would die for the opportunity to destroy Israel. The hope is that their are enough children and grandchildren of the Shah’s reign to foster the younger generation’s hunger for freedom like they had under the Shah. Pictures of Iran pre-revolution are amazing. They truly had a paradise with oil money flowing to the people, not to fanatical death squads.
We are a bunch of idiots led by idiots
Not a comparative at all. The enriched uranium does exist. Also it is horrible of you to use a picture of of a soldiers mis-fortune to try and make a parroting statement from people that have no morals. It isn't about Israel!!! Its about a group of people spreading terror around the world for the past 45 years and who murdered 200 of our Marines in their beds while they were on a peace keeping mission. Never use a picture like that again for your political gain. IT is the low of lows.
essence, the Ford serves as the centerpiece of a wider, layered defense network in the Mediterranean, rather than relying on its short-range, defensive-only weapons to stop long-range threats.
So the destroyers as part of the battle group is what is offering some protection to Israel, as well as to assets like our bases in the region, Cyprus and our assets currently based in Israel
The real answer here has little to do with the Gerald Ford itself. And the assertion that the mission is to protect Israel is somewhat dubious as well. The Mediterranean is a safer operating area, provides a different area of approach for aircraft, and offers protection to an area in the region within Iran's offensive missile range.
And your argument that the US is protecting Israel to the detriment of the Gulf States by stationing the USS Ford in the Mediterranean is just flat wrong on its face.
- The USS Lincoln is in the Arabian Sea off Oman right now, with Carrier Air Wing 9 (which includes F-35C) embarked.
- There are multiple LCS and Guided Missile Destroyers in the Persian Gulf right now at Bahrain.
- There are multiple Destroyers in the Straight of Hormuz right now.
- The entire Destroyer Squadron 21 is currently in the North Arabian Sea.
It's pretty well known if you know anything about aircraft carriers particularly US carriers.
Myself and others have told you but you keep referencing AIthat you obviously don't understand.
Aircraft carriers don't carry offensive weapons (except for the fighter aircraft they carry) they have limited range defensive weapons. Once again the carriers are going to be in open waters 100 miles plus out and not anywhere near the coast to do what you've been alleging.
