Iran


This guy is an idiot if he thinks that Israel being threatened won't lead Israel to act. He is a fool if he thinks that Israel acting won't lead Iran to respond against not only Israel, but Israel's allies. He is a moron if he doesn't think US interests can be threatened even if the US mainland remains safe.

There may be reasons to criticize what we are doing right now, but saying that the US wouldn't be threated by Iran if Israel attacked is idiocy. Heck, Iran is bombing other middle eastern countries! They sure aren't going to not try to kill Americans, whether we joined Israel or not.
 
And how is Reddit taking the last 48 hours?Have the servers melted?
Somehow the servers have persisted lol.

Honestly it doesn't sound all that different from here. Well at least the subreddits I lurk in.

Pretty feisty over there tonight with recent reporting on Hegseth and some military commanders going full Evangelical "this is a holy war/end times" in readiness meetings. That's all anybody is talking about at the moment. Oh and running out of interceptors.
 
It's like I posted last night.
I don't know which poster said North Korea has the bomb and they haven't used it. The religious zealots of Iran would 100 percent use it on Isreal and if they get a ICBM the US and Europe.
Yeah, 2 entirely different scenarios. North Korea is driven by a single authoritarian with nothing to motivate his masses. Iran, with their Shiite brand of hardline Islam has millions of fanatics who would die for the opportunity to destroy Israel. The hope is that their are enough children and grandchildren of the Shah’s reign to foster the younger generation’s hunger for freedom like they had under the Shah. Pictures of Iran pre-revolution are amazing. They truly had a paradise with oil money flowing to the people, not to fanatical death squads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
It's like I posted last night.
I don't know which poster said North Korea has the bomb and they haven't used it. The religious zealots of Iran would 100 percent use it on Isreal and if they get a ICBM the US and Europe.
Disagree. They don't want to be wiped off the face of the earth. They don't believe the **** they spew. They want power and money. Not death
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
Yeah, 2 entirely different scenarios. North Korea is driven by a single authoritarian with nothing to motivate his masses. Iran, with their Shiite brand of hardline Islam has millions of fanatics who would die for the opportunity to destroy Israel. The hope is that their are enough children and grandchildren of the Shah’s reign to foster the younger generation’s hunger for freedom like they had under the Shah. Pictures of Iran pre-revolution are amazing. They truly had a paradise with oil money flowing to the people, not to fanatical death squads.
Iran is made up of like 70m Shia Muslims, and I'm not sure assassinating a religious leader during Ramadan is a great way to gain support, but I could be wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
Not a comparative at all. The enriched uranium does exist. Also it is horrible of you to use a picture of of a soldiers mis-fortune to try and make a parroting statement from people that have no morals. It isn't about Israel!!! Its about a group of people spreading terror around the world for the past 45 years and who murdered 200 of our Marines in their beds while they were on a peace keeping mission. Never use a picture like that again for your political gain. IT is the low of lows.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VAVol85
essence, the Ford serves as the centerpiece of a wider, layered defense network in the Mediterranean, rather than relying on its short-range, defensive-only weapons to stop long-range threats.

So the destroyers as part of the battle group is what is offering some protection to Israel, as well as to assets like our bases in the region, Cyprus and our assets currently based in Israel

The real answer here has little to do with the Gerald Ford itself. And the assertion that the mission is to protect Israel is somewhat dubious as well. The Mediterranean is a safer operating area, provides a different area of approach for aircraft, and offers protection to an area in the region within Iran's offensive missile range.

So its another semantics thing. The destroyers are part of the battle group. They need the carrier there to back them up so we are stationing our assets next to Israel for the express purpose of protecting Israeli lives over American lives in the Gulf.

This is treason and should get everyone in this administration locked up.
 
And your argument that the US is protecting Israel to the detriment of the Gulf States by stationing the USS Ford in the Mediterranean is just flat wrong on its face.

- The USS Lincoln is in the Arabian Sea off Oman right now, with Carrier Air Wing 9 (which includes F-35C) embarked.

- There are multiple LCS and Guided Missile Destroyers in the Persian Gulf right now at Bahrain.

- There are multiple Destroyers in the Straight of Hormuz right now.

- The entire Destroyer Squadron 21 is currently in the North Arabian Sea.

The USS Gerald Ford is the newest, most expensive, and most advanced carrier. My argument was never that we left our bases in the Gulf defenseless. My argument was we prioritized protecting Israeli lives over American lives by stationing our most advanced carrier next to Israel rather than in the Gulf protecting our soldiers.

How about we give Israel those less advanced carriers and put our crown jewel carrier in the Gulf so it can protect our actual soldiers rather than the Israelis. This is about priorities. And its clear that our government is prioritizing the safety of Israel over the safety of our troops in the Gulf.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top