Carl Pickens
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2006
- Messages
- 46,973
- Likes
- 66,200
The limit on out-of-pocket costs, including deductibles and co-payments, was not supposed to exceed $6,350 for an individual and $12,700 for a family. But under a little-noticed ruling, federal officials have granted a one-year grace period to some insurers, allowing them to set higher limits, or no limit at all on some costs, in 2014.
consumers paying more is how they balance this?A senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said: We knew this was an important issue. We had to balance the interests of consumers with the concerns of health plan sponsors and carriers, which told us that their computer systems were not set up to aggregate all of a persons out-of-pocket costs. They asked for more time to comply.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/u...-nytimeshealth&seid=auto&_r=1&pagewanted=all&
consumers paying more is how they balance this?
make big promises, get support because of them and then roll those changes back while still claiming victory. Wonderful plan
This is no longer a political debate; this is what we call the law, Sebelius told a group that includes Democrats and Republicans, elected officials, political appointees and bureaucrats. It was passed and signed three years ago. It was upheld by the Supreme Court a year ago. The president was re-elected. This is the law of the land.
In a 1977 interview with Richard Nixon, David Frost asked: "So, what in a sense you're saying is that there are certain situations . . . where the president can decide that it's in the best interests of the nation . . . and do something illegal?"
Nixon: "Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal."
Frost: "By definition."
Nixon: "Exactly, exactly."
Nixon's claim, although constitutionally grotesque, was less so than the claim implicit in Obama's actions regarding the ACA. Nixon's claim was confined to matters of national security or (he said to Frost) "a threat to internal peace and order of significant magnitude." Obama's audacity is more spacious; it encompasses a right to disregard any portion of any law pertaining to any subject at any time when the political "environment" is difficult.