AJeray4TN
His Shirts Don't Wrinkle
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 12,300
- Likes
- 373
yes, central michigan is in his hometown. however ann arbor and east lansing are well within commute distance. I drove an 1 1/2 hrs to school 4 days a week for 2 years. it's quite possible. I'm not saying he would live at home and commute (the college i went to the athletes had to live on campus). But he would easily be able get home quickly, while still attending and playing for a BCS school.
Agree, and what possible good does it do for this University to force this on him? He will be leaving for somewhere and this does nothing but paint us in a negative light and provide negative recruiting ammunition for other coaches IMO.
question for those that might know.
What would happen if arnett just doesn't come back to UT and enrolls at UM or MSU without the release?
Depends. Is it about football or his dad?
Hubbs said on VQ that because of the timing of Arnett leaving UT, he didn't complete an entire year of classes, he may have to sit out more than just a year. There is a rule in the NCAA handbook about leaving mid-year. I think that has a lot to do with why Arnett is acting the way he is honestly.
someone in his family told VQ writer last night he was requesting a release. there could be several different reasons for what he is now saying and it might be too early to determine why the change in his position.
Maybe CDD told him he would not release him at this time. If he doesn't, then there is a 2 year sitting period for a true freshman that leaves in the middle of his freshman season.
that is one possible answer but I don't know why..
I don't get this. There are rules. UT has a policy. We have enforced it before and we are enforcing it again-- just like other schools do and have done for decades.
The PR nightmare is going to come into play if we let a teenager dictate policy through media blackmail. If UT's policy isn't the right one, then the people in charge of it need to take another look at it for the future. But, for now, we are enforcing the policy we have. No further comment. Story over.
I don't get this. There are rules. UT has a policy. We have enforced it before and we are enforcing it again-- just like other schools do and have done for decades.
The PR nightmare is going to come into play if we let a teenager dictate policy through media blackmail. If UT's policy isn't the right one, then the people in charge of it need to take another look at it for the future. But, for now, we are enforcing the policy we have. No further comment. Story over.