BanditVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
 - Oct 19, 2012
 
- Messages
 - 4,921
 
- Likes
 - 3,785
 
Do you think having banks there would have kept them from scoring ~30pts more than us?
I didn't mean not having Banks there, although I do think it would help. It would help in two ways, he is our leading tackler and also (I have heard) the defensive play caller and a leader. So being a leader and leading tackler, that makes a difference.
But what I meant was that if he and Hooker truly got into a fight and there is a lot of team dissension, then that could well explain the defensive performance. I meant mostly that.
Banks defintely is a key part of the D though.
				
						