volgr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 7,395
- Likes
- 7,302
LMAO. You and your womp womp.But you don’t want to have a debate. You do just as I said you spew whataboutism and non sequiturs. And we rightly call you on it. That isn’t a debate it’s deflection and that’s on you Curly. Womp womp.
On and welcome back again to Curly Danth
Russia looks to be winding down and Ukraine is building up. Ukraine started out with a lot of ragtag volunteers using anything they had - and held Kiev. Now Ukraine is picking up new and far more lethal weapons, and those volunteers are being trained to use them. You could be right or you could be very wrong in your analysis, but it's too early to start counting chickens before the eggs hatch.
Your great debate material isn’t any where near the quality you think it is Curly as judged by the posters who see it. Outside of the stooge trio your dog arguments gain no traction. Clearly that’s all of our failing and we just can’t comprehend or counter your sheer genius right? LMAOLMAO. You and your womp womp.
I posted plenty of debate material last Friday and your fellow hens came out of the hen house that afternoon with their usual deflections. You guys aren't interested in debates. Just finger pointing, insults and staying on repeat.
Judging by what posters? Septic and Hill? LMAO. Like I respect the opinions of those "moderates".Your great debate material isn’t any where near the quality you think it is Curly as judged by the posters who see it. Outside of the stooge trio your dog arguments gain no traction. Clearly that’s our failing and we just can’t comprehend or counter your sheer genius right? LMAO
Oh I agree. It's a popular method. But your side is the one arguing that you are the real truth, so I would expect better.I've actually been mocking your buddies as they are the ones constantly using the terms "strawman", "Non sequitur", and "Whataboutism" because they can't defend the arguments they've made. While a few posts later throwing out non sequiturs and whataboutisms themselves LMAO. So point number 2 definitely applies to your crew here.
It is. You just dont apply it equally.
You believe it is wrong Ukraine used force to retake its eastern provinces going back 2014. But you dont believe it's wrong that Russia is now using force to kill, in your opinion, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians, based on your believed K : D ratio.
You believe it's wrong that the west is propping up Ukraine in their losing fight to remain independent. But you had no problem with Russia backing the rebels in a losing fight to be independent. Even though that backing going back 8 years is what to this larger conflict now. If the rebels had just rolled over this would be over.
The slant continues.
Instead of letting a small local intra-national event end in 4 months back in 2014, Russia made it a world wide international event event that has kept on for more than 8 years.No, Russia went in and put an end to it.
Your post has absolutely nothing to do with what I was talking about. I mentioned nothing about nukes.Oh I agree. It's a popular method. But your side is the one arguing that you are the real truth, so I would expect better.
So you going to go back and address my post since your straw man post was a joke?
Great. Then when the rest of the world decides to make Ukraine more mightier and they kick Pootin’s balls out of your sweet caress you shouldn’t complain.
Oh we’ve been in the real world Larry. The only difference is we’ve correctly identified the actual aggressor and cause of this whole situation.I'm not complaining nor would I complain. I said from the start if the West puts boots on the ground in Ukraine, Russia is toast. In the same way, if Russia were to start striking western targets outside of Ukraine I wouldn't complain. They have every right to do so at this point. We have foolishly become an enemy combatant. Welcome to the real world.
Instead of letting a small local intra-national event end in 4 months back in 2014, Russia made it a world wide international event event that has kept on for more than 8 years.
They really are pretty simpleThey use a couple methods to avoid ever actually address the arguments.
1." I already answered that." But never can link to the response, or copy it, or give the cliff notes.
2. Use of the terms "straw man", "non sequitur", or "whataboutism". While never explaining how the original comment is actually any of those. And usually it's right after their own red herring or whataboutism.
3. "That's western propaganda" aka shooting the messenger to avoid the message.
Literally near everyone outside of the stooge trio Curly. It’s all right here in this thread.
Apparently you two trees have him completely unable to see the huge forest of everyone outside the stooge trio directly behind you.He's mad that he doesn't get to put everyone in a box for him to sneer at.
@volfanhill and I seemed to have really irritated him in that respect.
It’s pretty bad when the “liberals” and “conservatives” of the board all think your argument is pedantic and juvenile and uneducatedHe's mad that he doesn't get to put everyone in a box for him to sneer at.
@volfanhill and I seemed to have really irritated him in that respect.
Really? Then where was the liberators welcome Russia was expecting? I dont even see the pro Russian sites pushing any media showing people waving the tri colors in occupied Ukraine.I have seen no evidence of that being true.