The Original Fade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 7,656
- Likes
- 20,917
At this point I’d take him. Maybe the biggest question is WHO WILL TAKE US?Probably a pipe dream considering how big a dumpster fire we are. But without having to compensate Pruitt and with healthy conference revenues coming in, maybe we could make it worth his while financially. And our expectations for success versus what he encountered at Texas - well, we're so battered and bruised we'd build him a statue if he could repeat what he did in Austin.
Barnes basically fell in our lap, for those who see the inevitable comparison. Coming here after our Sweet 16 run was not that big of stretch, thankfully. Getting Herman here WOULD be - and would take a ton of skill, commitment, and money to make it happen. But our never-ending experiment of hiring up-and-comers is a proven failure on the football side. Such is the real lesson of the inspired hire of the proven Rick Barnes.
Never said I was good with it, I said if he's winning which my thoughts of winning means 9-10 games, if that's the case whats the problem of hiring him full time. I don't think 4-5 games to be considered "winning"That's exactly my point. Whose definition of winning? You said you were good with it if he wins. What's that look like to you?
I would take Herman in a heartbeat. He'd very given security and a much longer leash than what he had in Texas.
Plus, apparently he reach out to USCe to express interest in that job opening before they wint with Beamer Jr. If he would have been happy with them, you have to think Tennessee would be an attractive opportunity
You and I agree. But I am of the belief that the University would 100% offer him the job full time if we made a bowl.Never said I was good with it, I said if he's winning which my thoughts of winning means 9-10 games, if that's the case whats the problem of hiring him full time. I don't think 4-5 games to be considered "winning"
