To Protect and to Serve II

That would be up to the companies. I’m sure they’d have a criteria. We could look at the threat management company in Detroit for examples.

For any of this to have the slightest chance of being successful there will need to be a significant curtailment of the criminal code in this country. Or as slice said, they’ll just fill the prisons with poor folks and drug offenders and it’ll be the same song, second verse.
I guess what I was eluding to is that you may end up with a bunch of former cops lining to fill in these spots based on the criteria and available talent...
 
I guess what I was eluding to is that you may end up with a bunch of former cops lining to fill in these spots based on the criteria and available talent...
I wouldn’t see that as a bad thing. Although I’d imagine it would be like playing basketball when you’re used to playing football.


For the record, I don’t see any of this happening anytime soon. People simply love the state entirely too much even to their own detriment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
I guess what I was eluding to is that you may end up with a bunch of former cops lining to fill in these spots based on the criteria and available talent...
Exactly what I was thinking. You cannot have the same people who resort to violence when their feelings get hurt being on the front lines of law enforcement again.
BTW- alluding not eluding. You’re very welcome 😉
 
https://nypost.com/2020/06/08/video-shows-cop-on-cyclist-beatdown-during-george-floyd-protest

McCaffrey said cops kept him in jail for two hours — before releasing him with a disorderly conduct summons for cursing them out while he was on the ground.

What?!?!? Cops curse at people all of the time. It is sickening to see cops be able to get away with behavior that they so readily charge people with. And isn’t cursing protected speech? Any lawyers on this site care to comment? Any LEO’s care to comment?
 
Last edited:
"What would have been a routine traffic stop, ended with Javier's dear."

Travis County DA says WCSO, Live PD ‘stonewalled’ in-custody death investigation
I don't agree with lighting him up four times, but why didn't he just stop in the first place? Honestly, I have the same question about George Floyd. He was handcuffed, and they were attempting to put him in the back of a squad car, and he fought them. Why? That doesn't excuse the actions of the officers, but why resist? It makes no sense.
 
Chattanooga PD Chief updates policy, requires officers to intervene in police brutality

Seems like a reasonable step.

I was not in any way a fan of David Roddy because of one of his executive management decisions (somewhat chronicled in this thread) but that guy is already gone and Roddy has been a bit of a pleasant surprise.

Roddy is in favor of outside review. Currently they send (at least some of and more serious) complaints to Hamilton Co for review and investigation at least making an effort for a fair investigation. I like Roddy so far.
 
Dims want to create this:
Create the National Police Misconduct Registry to prevent officers accused of wrongdoing from getting jobs at other agencies.

Wow. Creating databases tracking people "Accused of wrongdoing". Want to know who else created lists? Nazis. <--semi blue font
 
Who in the hell will want to become a cop now?
iu


iu
 
Dims want to create this:
Create the National Police Misconduct Registry to prevent officers accused of wrongdoing from getting jobs at other agencies.

Wow. Creating databases tracking people "Accused of wrongdoing". Want to know who else created lists? Nazis. <--semi blue font

This is common sense. One of the main reason that police brutality continues is that cops that actually get in trouble for it just get a job in the next county or city until they find a place they can get away with their crimes at.

You would not want a pilot that was banned from flying in one state due to negligence and incompetence being your pilot because he switched companies. You would not want a dr who gets his professional license stripped in another state to operate on you here. Same thing.


A registry of violent offenders is on par with the sex offender registry. I guess you are against that too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolFaninFla
This is common sense. One of the main reason that police brutality continues is that cops that actually get in trouble for it just get a job in the next county or city until they find a place they can get away with their crimes at.

You would not want a pilot that was banned from flying in one state due to negligence and incompetence being your pilot because he switched companies. You would not want a dr who gets his professional license stripped in another state to operate on you here. Same thing.


A registry of violent offenders is on par with the sex offender registry. I guess you are against that too.
LOL. Wtf??? Its a registry for the ACCUSED. Not the convicted. Do you not know how anything works? For a guy who likes to tell people to "Educate" themselves you seem pretty far down the knowledge totem pole.

If you are accused of raping a person you dont get put on a sex offender list. If you get convicted you do. Democrats want to put anyone who has a "complaint" against them on a list. See, thats like me saying hey K-town Court Jester, you touched someone inappropriate last week at around 3:32 pm. Time to go on that sex offender list now right? Good lord.

And lets educate you on something. Pilots dont get "banned from flying in a state". Its federally regulated. You lose your license you lose your license.

Convicted of a police brutality? Ok, go on a list. Accused? No. This isn't Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union..
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top