Should Tim Banks be replaced at end of season?

#103
#103
Carl Pickens said:
I’m still shocked at how soft the D looked. They were getting manhandled
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
#104
#104
hUTch2002 said:
I was so pissed on that stupid defensive call on 4th and 24 that I wanted him fired immediately but of course that’s ridiculous. I was just mad because it was a dumb call and you could see it coming a mile away. He’s done well this year. Very well actually. I’ve been pleased by the offense but truly shocked by our defense prior to tonight. Rough game tonight but it happens and we still found a way to win.
Click to expand...

I think the players like him, too, which counts for a lot. But if I am CJH, I demand some changes in light of what happened tonight. We have a totally different season at 6-6 and a two game losing streak to Kentucky...and we came mighty close to that tonight because of our D. Maybe it was a one-off situation...or maybe it was something that the DC needs to be held accountable for.
 
#105
#105
volinthenorth said:
I think the players like him, too, which counts for a lot. But if I am CJH, I demand some changes in light of what happened tonight. We have a totally different season at 6-6 and a two game losing streak to Kentucky...and we came mighty close to that tonight because of our D. Maybe it was a one-off situation...or maybe it was something that the DC needs to be held accountable for.
Click to expand...
I trust coach to handle it. I do think UK played an inspired game as well so that was part of it. They were determined not to lose again which makes it all the sweeter!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbones0711
#107
#107
BigOrangeTrain said:
Look at the LBs Banks inherited. Jesus OP, you have won the dumbest thread of the year.
Click to expand...

I actually think it's you who look dumb. You don't really seem to know how to respond to the things that were said...or even display any evidence of understanding them. Also, what does Jesus have to do anything? This is a dumb reply all around.
 
#110
#110
OP got the response for which he was angling. 😏 He hasn’t been 100% trollistic so jury out. But this was dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
#118
#118
No…
No disrespect intended but Solon page started tonight. Let that sink in. The guy is literally turning chicken **** into chicken salad. If anything give him an extension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinthenorth
#119
#119
volinthenorth said:
Yes, I know, my VN friends: (1) "We just won a big game, why go negative?" (I'm not being negative, this is just a question in direct response to our objectively bad defensive play) (2) "The D just had a huge TOP discrepancy, they were gassed!" (Agreed, but were they partly gassed because our coaching scheme didn't get them off the field?) (3) "We are low on scholarships and bodies who can play!" Yes, again, I know all that. My question (and it's just a question, not a call for a march on the athletic facility with torches or for a nocturnal visit to the rock with spray paint) is this: DOES TIM BANKS's DEFENSIVE SCHEME HOLD US BACK? Are we going to be able get to the next level with this lack of pressure from our 3 man rushes and infrequent blitzing or stunting, combined with a soft zone in the second and third levels? This impotent combo seems to give the opposing QB that extra second to find the receiver who turns and sits down in a hole in the secondary or breaks into a gap between our flat-footed DBs.

So do we stick with our guy and hit the portal for better players? Or do we find a coach with a better scheme (and still hit that portal)?
Click to expand...

You can't keep mentioning caveats and then NOT actually factor them in!!🙄.

Dude...
 
  • Like
Reactions: butchna
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top