A loss is a loss. Who cares about the margin? To suggest that Pruitt is somehow less than Dooley is just incredibly stupid. Dooley inherited a better situation talent wise and never had a winning season. Pruitt got to 8 wins and a bowl game in his second season, which BTW, is also better than Jones. There is no comparison with Dooley and Pruitt, Pruitt is clearly better and while the jury is still out a bit on the Jones-Pruitt comparison I would still take Pruitt over Jones any day.
For those above that would interpret this as unabashedly pro-Pruittism, I can assure you it's not. I'm just saying Pruitt is still IMO the best we have had since Fulmer (not counting Kiffin's one year) of coaches who actually stuck it out.
If he ends up not being so great, it just means we have only marginally improved with each hire. But I see a big difference between Pruitt and Dooley and an improvement over Jones.