NBA Trade Rumors

The Bucks have offered Bogut and their 1st round pick (11th, I think) for Minnesota's #2 pick.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
The Bucks have offered Bogut and their 1st round pick (11th, I think) for Minnesota's #2 pick.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

That's a tough one. Bogut is quality, but Derrick Williams has a lot of potential so if he's available at #2 that makes it a tough call.
 
That's a tough one. Bogut is quality, but Derrick Williams has a lot of potential so if he's available at #2 that makes it a tough call.

No it's an easy call, take Bogut. Minnesota doesn't have room for Williams on the team
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Yeah, considering they were thinking seriously about trading #2 for #13 and Marcin Gortat, I would expect them to say yes to the Bogut deal. I think Gortat is pretty underrated though.
 
No it's an easy call, take Bogut. Minnesota doesn't have room for Williams on the team
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Like cap room? Williams plays the same position as Beasley and Beasley sucks, so I'd say they have room.
 
Yeah, considering they were thinking seriously about trading #2 for #13 and Marcin Gortat, I would expect them to say yes to the Bogut deal. I think Gortat is pretty underrated though.

Very underrated. He was actually better than Bogut this year, IMO.
 
Like cap room? Williams plays the same position as Beasley and Beasley sucks, so I'd say they have room.

Williams will be a 4 trying to play the 3. Beasley has more offensive potential than him. Beasley sucks, seriously?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Williams will be a 4 trying to play the 3. Beasley has more offensive potential than him. Beasley sucks, seriously?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Doesn't that more accurately describe Beasley? Beasley has already proven he doesn't have offensive potential in the NBA. The jury is out on Williams.

And yes. Anybody who shoots 17 FGA per game while shooting poorly is not a good player unless they bring something else to the table. Beasley doesn't play D well, he doesn't pass well, and he turns the ball over a lot.
 
Doesn't that more accurately describe Beasley? Beasley has already proven he doesn't have offensive potential in the NBA. The jury is out on Williams.

And yes. Anybody who shoots 17 FGA per game while shooting poorly is not a good player unless they bring something else to the table. Beasley doesn't play D well, he doesn't pass well, and he turns the ball over a lot.

Beasley has proven he has no offensive potential? That's just dumb. Beasley is more of a natural 3 than Williams. Williams also has more value in a trade so you trade him to add a piece to your team
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
I don't think that is going to help their current situation at the backcourt position.

I don't either, I'm just basing it off Kupchak:

On whether the draft is really as weak as everybody says it is:
“We’d like to have a top-five pick in the draft, because there are good players out there. Going into the draft, there doesn’t appear to be a player with the hype that the previous drafts have had -- a Greg Oden, LeBron James, stuff like that -- but you really can’t evaluate a draft before the draft.

I think I've seen him say that somewhere else too, but I'm not sure.

And if they do keep the triangle (though I've seen reports they won't) Brandon Knight would be a perfect fit.
 
He won't be a lockdown defender but he'll be above average. Rubio has quick hands so he could average a couple steals a game
Posted via VolNation Mobile

He gets steals, but as far as staying in front of people I wouldn't even call him above-average.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top