Kingston Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2009
- Messages
- 26,325
- Likes
- 28,819
Williams and turner are 2 totally different players. Turner does a lot of things well and was a triple double waiting to happen everytime he set foot on the court in college. Turner hasn't been a bust at all and I don't think Williams will be either.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Jennings. Rondo is actually good.
Wow. I would have never made that connection. Turner took almost three times as many 3's as Williams in their final years of college. Also I don't think there's any way Williams could play guard.
Williams shot an absolutely ridiculous .595 FG%. He may bust, but I'm expecting him to be the best player in the draft. Irving may be, but he only played 11 games and that's too little to go off of.
Jennings is much more of a scorer and much less of a passer than Rubio. Aside from the fact that I don't think Rubio will ever come close to 55 points in a game, 5 assists per game is way too low for the way he plays. They have nothing in common except for the fact that they can't shoot.
7 points 3 rebounds and 2 assists a game on a .500 team.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Nor do I... The kid has been average in Europe for the last two years, he'll be borderline bench quality in the NBA. Plus the Wolves are putting way too much pressure on him to be the savior of the franchise.
That .500 team was very young overall and also made the playoffs. Philly has a crowded backcourt so he's still trying to find his way. Not saying he'll be a perennial all star, but far from a bust.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I expected a hell of a lot more from him. I can't say one good thing about his rookie year. He might play in a crowded back court, but if you look at his stats per 36 minutes (about what you'd expect from a starter) he averaged 11 points, 6 rebounds, 3 assists, and 1 steal while shooting an abysmal .484 TS%.
He only started 14 games because of that crowded back court that i referenced, so he played well in his opportunities imo. If you watched him in college (which I don't know if you did or not), he was the primary ball-handler. So now he has to also make the transition to off the ball. How many rookies not named Blake Griffin came in and set the world on fire? Also if you go by advanced stats he played just about on par with number 1 pick John Wall. Either way it's too early to determine if either was a bust or not.
Who according to advanced stats, isn't very good. There is a rookie besides Blake Griffin who set the world on fire, and he plays Turner's position. Advanced stats rank Landry Fields as a top 20 player in productivity (Blake Griffin was top 10).
http://www.wagesofwins.com/AllPlayersRank2010-11.html
Landry Fields crashed and burned at the end of the season, and was a complete liability in the playoffs. Jury is still out on him, he either played well above his head to start, or he got in a black hole type slump.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I'd trust what he did over 82 games rather than what he did over 4 games. If I were you, I'd be looking forward to years of excellent guard play for your Knicks. I'd expect him to score more like 15 ppg next season and continue to shoot a very high %.
