Kavanaugh Confirmation

Exhibit A:

200w.gif
You are a fool. A partisan hack that shows your ignorance daily. The best advice I will give you is to stop posting, revealing your idiocy. I know you will continue to enlighten us with you horse chit.

Anyways, back to work. Holler.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaybird_1981
You are a fool. A partisan hack that shows your ignorance daily. The best advice I will give you is to stop posting, revealing your idiocy. I know you will continue to enlighten us with you horse chit.

Anyways, back to work. Holler.

But....But........LG is an "ATTORNEY"
 
You are a fool. A partisan hack that shows your ignorance daily. The best advice I will give you is to stop posting, revealing your idiocy. I know you will continue to enlighten us with you horse chit.

Anyways, back to work. Holler.


giphy.gif
 
We haven't heard from any of the Kavanuagh opponents (from this thread) what they think of the allegation described in the Guardian article and that Feinstein has been aware of this since July.

Assuming that's it do you stand by the Dems use of this tactic?
 
We haven't heard from any of the Kavanuagh opponents (from this thread) what they think of the allegation described in the Guardian article and that Feinstein has been aware of this since July.

Assuming that's it do you stand by the Dems use of this tactic?

It comes down to the details, of course. The "locked in a room" thing, if that's actually all there is.. That would be straight-up lame, and there is no way Diane could believe it would be worthy of a criminal investigation.

If that's it.. stalling tactic, at best.
 
But, he was in high school, it was 30 years ago, and he's "categorically denied it". So it's OK now.

I want everyone to know the story , but I don’t want anyone to know who I am ? Really? That’s not how this works at all .
 
But, he was in high school, it was 30 years ago, and he's "categorically denied it". So it's OK now.

No, it's pretty damn suspicious.

And no, I wouldn't hold it against him even if true. Too much water under that bridge.
 
She had the letter in July but did nothing until after the hearings and right before the vote?

You buying the story?

Just be careful if Ronan's talking to the alleged victim. He's already go Kavanaugh committing to a "categorical and unequivocal" denial. Be interesting to see if he comes back with follow up stories setting forth more information/evidence now that he has Kavanaugh on the record denying the allegations.
 
Just be careful if Ronan's talking to the alleged victim. He's already go Kavanaugh committing to a "categorical and unequivocal" denial. Be interesting to see if he comes back with follow up stories setting forth more information/evidence now that he has Kavanaugh on the record denying the allegations.

3 people in the room 30+ years ago. 2 say nothing like that happened, what ****ing evidence could he have? More anonymous sources?
 
Just be careful if Ronan's talking to the alleged victim. He's already go Kavanaugh committing to a "categorical and unequivocal" denial. Be interesting to see if he comes back with follow up stories setting forth more information/evidence now that he has Kavanaugh on the record denying the allegations.

Ronan tries real hard to be a journalist.
 
3 people in the room 30+ years ago. 2 say nothing like that happened, what ****ing evidence could he have? More anonymous sources?
I have no idea what he has or doesn't have. I do know when he writes stories about powerful men and sexual assault it usually doesn't end well for the man.
 
3 people in the room 30+ years ago. 2 say nothing like that happened, what ****ing evidence could he have? More anonymous sources?
This is the type of stuff that scares me. just the accusation can ruin someone's career. no evidence, doesn't matter what others said. just throwing an accusation out there is enough apparently. scary stuff.
 
No, it's pretty damn suspicious.

And no, I wouldn't hold it against him even if true. Too much water under that bridge.

Depends on the details (which we'll never know) but we still don't know what "forced himself on her" means. Was he trying to take his clothes off and rape her - if we knew that then he's disqualified for sure. Was he trying to kiss her and she refused but interpreted that as him forcing himself on her - if that's the case then we move on.

The problem is that the accuser doesn't want to discuss it, we only know about the allegation details from people who are against Kavanuagh paraphrasing it, K has denied it and there is no way to further investigate since the accuser doesn't want to do so.

I hope to hell this isn't the new standard in politics but of course it will be and the various bases will totally rationalize and justify it when their team uses it.
 
This is the type of stuff that scares me. just the accusation can ruin someone's career. no evidence, doesn't matter what others said. just throwing an accusation out there is enough apparently. scary stuff.

My wife has even said it's BS.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top