DarthVisor
Belee dat
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2008
- Messages
- 5,152
- Likes
- 43
One freakin' game? Where were you from 2002 to 2008?
Its like I said earlier, when we have a coach win more than 75% of his games, conference and national titles, then and only then will your points be valid. You can bring up 2002 to 2008 all you want, but when you look at the body of work, the man is a Vol legend.
To answer your question, I missed the 2003 SECCG, but did get to go in 2004 and 2007.
Because every place he has coached was a train wreck before he arrived. Oakland only gave him a season and a half for crying out loud. Vince Lombardi couldn't have fixed that mess of a team in that short period of time.
Its like I said earlier, when we have a coach win more than 75% of his games, conference and national titles, then and only then will your points be valid. You can bring up 2002 to 2008 all you want, but when you look at the body of work, the man is a Vol legend.
To answer your question, I missed the 2003 SECCG, but did get to go in 2004 and 2007.
Irrelevant. Won 64% of his games from 2002 - 2008. Should've been given a parade and ten virgins, along with a lifetime contract.
His entire body of work included a decade without a title, and getting clobbered by our rivals.
Another thing I don't understand about gibbs n co: how can you blend Fulmer's vey good 1st decade with his mediocre end? Can they not see the suck at the end of his career?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
his "mediocre" end included three seccg appearance which is what every vol fan should want at the start of every season.
Yes, it is important to get over, but we happened to hit three eventual nc in those games. In 2001, we actually fell victim to the terrorists whose murderous actions moved the florida game to the week before the seccg.
In addition, what most of us realized was phil fulmer was the best coach for tennessee at the time. Without the hambone experiment, 2008 is still mediocre, but a winning season. We also realize that 2005 and 2008 were aberrations with the worst qb play ever in ncaa history from two nfl qbs - survivable in the acc, deadly in the sec. And yet, we still would have had a winning season. All the coaching in the world could not slow the game down for crompton, who had five different ocs. In addition, the landscape of the sec changed in the noughties - with four different nc - which makes coaching at tennessee one of the most difficult in the country - and still we were competing for the secc.
Subsequently, we have been proven right as rain. After all the machinations, hambone appoints lane kiffin if and only if his daddy is part of the package. In essence, he hired a septugenarian coordinator to replace our 2nd greatest coach ever. Foolishness could not be writ more large. When we had the great fortune of the "worst sec coaching hire in 60 years" dashing to the left coast, hambone still could not secure a proven winner.
I have said many times, i have some sympathy for the fcf crowd. Phil did let his foot off the gas for a couple of years. I personally think it was like michael jordan playing baseball. I think phil was returning full circle, ready for one last "decade of dominance" push. He got unlucky in 2001 and 2007 (nothing he could do about 2004). I feel the fire was back. He had a better recruiting class lined up than the eventual kiffin class (now the most epic bust class in 60 years of sec football), and one that fits needs. The players we would have had under fulmer would have had us in contention for the sece last year.
But hambone exhibited all the foolishness of the gof on this board. This board was thrilled with a coach because he was mentioned (pejoratively, actually) in lil wayne songs. This was "the way forward." this was "the plan." meanwhile, the core was alienated, and that coach - well, is a symbol of market failure and the end times of capitalism.
The foolishness could not be more alive in vivid technicolor today.
Yes, it is important to get over, but we happened to hit three eventual NC in those games. In 2001, we actually fell victim to the terrorists whose murderous actions moved the Florida game to the week before the SECCG.
Two quick things:
UT played LSU in the 01 SEC CG. Miami was your national champion.
UT played Auburn in the 04 SEC CG. USC was your national champion.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Quibbling gets you nowhere. And, actually, you are wrong besides.
That LSU team went on to win a NC.
Auburn 2004 was the best team of the noughties in the SEC, and is now, rightly, considered the NC even if the NCAA has capitulated worse than Obama. USC is no longer the BCS NC.
I really appreciate Hamilton giving us the two wins against Vandy and UK in 08. Never would have won them without announcing the firing in midseason. Totally changed the team. Probably looking at a nine loss season otherwise.
I think from now on I'm just going to make stuff up and use that as my sole source of evidence.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I guess this year if we go 6-6 its still better than Fulmer would have done, right?
For much of the time, UF was the only other team in the conference. He hasno business with a losing record to Auburn.he only had a losing record against 2 teams:
Florida
Auburn
About.com: http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/
This was stupid almost from the word go. Don't let idiocy from Vegas Clown lead you to believe that LSU team had any business besting Fulmer's conservative silliness. He was outcoached, period. That LSU team won nothing but the SEC title that should har been ours.Quibbling gets you nowhere. And, actually, you are wrong besides.
That LSU team went on to win a NC.
Auburn 2004 was the best team of the noughties in the SEC, and is now, rightly, considered the NC even if the NCAA has capitulated worse than Obama. USC is no longer the BCS NC.
