tvolsfan
VN GURU
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 40,004
- Likes
- 13,068
...it's about whatever the media wants it to be.
I think Troy Smith's winning of the heisman this year is completely justified...if you take him off OSU this year they are lucky to go .500...
That's ridiculous. UT might have made a BCS bowl with the schedule OSU played. Justin Zwick easily would have guided them to 2-loss at worst record. Conversely, Troy Smith wouldn't have been too special on a lot of other teams.
Based on assumption. If he went 206th in the draft and Woodson went top 5, I am going to assume that Woodson was just a better coverage guy, because I can't look at all my game tapes and make the decision.
Often? Often doesn't count as criteria. It is true or false. The truth is, Woodson wasn't the best player in football that year, end of story.
Which is why I refer to non-production as snobbery. It's the sort of stuff that the media uses to promote whoever they like, in this context.
"Yeah, this quarterback has 58 touchdown passes and 2 interceptions to go with 1900 rushing yards and an unbeaten record. But he's not as good as this one who has 9 TD passes and 26 INTs. It's only you knuckle-draggers who don't understand the game the way I do who actually put stock into a guy's production."
See the media love for Derek Jeter versus Alex Rodriguez and tell me it's not the same. As far as who the better player is, it's not even close....yet the media would have us believe Jeter is so great because of "what doesn't show up in the numbers" (which is spurious anyway, since nearly anything in baseball can be quantified)
It's hard to agree with that. Woodson certainly was outstanding that year. The bottom line is he came through with championships on the line, so that certainly swung people his way.