NashVol11
Gloomed to Fail
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 28,069
- Likes
- 11,767
Bull****, it's a constant "he had 2 losingq seasons in 4 years!"
And was getting dominated by his rivals, and had a losing record against every good coach, and hadn't won the conference this century, and hadn't had a nationally relevant team since 2001, and kept losing games he shouldn't. But feel free to act like it's just that one thing
Because we've been making crappy hires. That doesn't make Fulmer any more desirable.
Fulmer was begging for jobs, including South Florida and Louisville, and no one was interested. Gruden can have damn near any job he wants. Those are far from "the same."
And what does Saban, Spurrier, Kelly, etc.... have that Gruden doesnt?
College Head Coaching experience
You're trying to make comparisons when there's flagrant variable. Grudens next win as a CFB HC will be his first.
Just remember if you say there's a reason Fulmer isnt a HC somewhere, the same can be said about Gruden.
If you say the game passed Fulmer by, then the same can be said about the guy that
1. Has never been a CFB HC
2. Hasnt been a HC in 9 years
3. Hasnt been part of a college football program in 28 years
Yeah, dont quit your lithium:crazy:
those are your words. How do you know Gruden hasnt "begged" for jobs too? How do you know that Fulmer didnt say no to any job?
Answer: you dont
In the end, both dont have HC jobs and havent in quite some time.
Jon Gruden has reportedly turned down three offers to return to the NFL coaching ranks.
ESPN reported Saturday that the Colts talked with Gruden about the position. There have been conflicting reports in recent weeks on whether current coach Chuck Pagano will be retained after the Colts' 8-8 season.
Gruden denies the two sides have talked, telling ESPN, I know nothing. Ive told people, Im not coaching. Im a broadcaster, Im not a coach.
ESPN's Adam Schefter says the other two teams that Gruden rejected were the Rams and 49ers.
But you are completely hypocritical. You have to realize that. You can't use Gruden's NFLHC record as evidence he isn't a good coach when other good NCAA HC have had even worse careers in the NFL.
No one knows how Gruden will do. But odds are, he'd do very well, considering his performance in the NFL. To suggest otherwise is pretty foolish.
Fulmer was begging for jobs, including South Florida and Louisville, and no one was interested. Gruden can have damn near any job he wants. Those are far from "the same."
Fulmer was begging for jobs, including South Florida and Louisville, and no one was interested. Gruden can have damn near any job he wants. Those are far from "the same."
Gruden's own quote says they didn't talk. Not sure what your point is.
I wouldn't be surprised if Gruden didn't talk to anyone himself. His agent though?
If Adam Schefter says he turned down offers to coach, I'll believe it.
My point is Gruden probably could have gotten back into coaching in the NFL if he really wanted to.
Not really. NFL coaches deal with adults doing a job and are more of managers. They don't recruit, they don't have to motivate, they don't have to juggle NCAA, aren't working 70+ hours a week, aren't having to get back from a road trip and immediately go to a high schooler's house, aren't having to make sure players go to class and all that. It's a huge difference, and not an easier one.
LOL what?
Gruden engineered some of the best offenses in the NFL with no name QB's. But that's "being a manager" Low, whatever dude.
Gruden won't need to physically recruit as much as the average college coach. He has brand recognition. And I can guarantee Gruden was working well over 70+ hours a week as HC of an NFL team. Well may be not in the offseason, but neither do college coaches in the offseason.
You believe a 3rd party and not the guy himself who, in the article you posted, said he did not talk to anyone?
But you are completely hypocritical. You have to realize that. You can't use Gruden's NFLHC record as evidence he isn't a good coach when other good NCAA HC have had even worse careers in the NFL.
No one knows how Gruden will do. But odds are, he'd do very well, considering his performance in the NFL. To suggest otherwise is pretty foolish.
The minute you bank on "brand recognition" as your primary way to succeed is the minute you fail.
to suggest a guy that's never been and CFB HC and out of college ball for that long is even more foolish
we can play this "you're wrong. No, you're wrong" all day long. In the end I'd rather have someone guiding out program that has recent experience with recruiting in today's era as well as recent coaching experience. Rolling the dice on hoping the guy might work or might bring in players sets us up for more years of sub mediocrity
