To Protect and to Serve II

#6,426
#6,426
RockyTop85 said:
I love it when you tell me that a wealthy celebrity bankrupting himself to discredit a police force for planting evidence, in one of the most notorious instances of investigative misconduct in recent memory, is indicative of a typical defendant’s advantages in the American criminal court system.

Also, I may very well be a terrible attorney, but Tennessee courts have held that a few hours was enough time for a defense attorney to review discovery, and have held that matters concerning the timely production of discovery are subject to a highly deferential standard of review. It’s not an issue that has any appellate merit. Trial judges have no incentive to set or enforce discovery deadlines.
Click to expand...
OJ was innocent and is once again searching for the real killer
 
#6,427
#6,427
RockyTop85 said:
I had to google him. Is this the San Francisco mayor case?
Click to expand...
The assassination of Harvey Milk and George Moscone, defense based on diminished capacity due to alteration of diet due to severe depression.
 
Last edited:
#6,428
#6,428
RockyTop85 said:
I love it when you tell me that a wealthy celebrity bankrupting himself to discredit a police force for planting evidence, in one of the most notorious instances of investigative misconduct in recent memory, is indicative of a typical defendant’s advantages in the American criminal court system.

Also, I may very well be a terrible attorney, but Tennessee courts have held that a few hours was enough time for a defense attorney to review discovery, and have held that matters concerning the timely production of discovery are subject to a highly deferential standard of review. It’s not an issue that has any appellate merit. Trial judges have no incentive to set or enforce discovery deadlines.
Click to expand...
Sorry about what I said. You are most likely a great attorney practicing in a backwards location. I have never been in a trial where the defense was not provided everything months or up to a year in advance. I have never seen a USA or a state prosecutor withhold discovery, ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85
#6,429
#6,429
RIP Sgt. Ron Helus, a 29-year veteran
ron-helus.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines, Matt2496 and InVOLuntary
#6,434
#6,434
InVOLuntary said:
Because cops are people to. Cops are a microcosm of society in general. There are great, good, meh, bad, very bad people in society. Some cops will inevitably be bad and very bad. Some will be good to great. The vast majority are probably meh. Hopefully the bad to very bad get rooted out and are served with the appropriate punishment they deserve. Also, hopefullythe good ones and great ones get the appropriate praise and rewards they deserve and inspire the meh ones to be good and great.
Click to expand...

What I'm asking is how he behaves like this and gets to be a cop for so long?
 
#6,436
#6,436
n_huffhines said:
What I'm asking is how he behaves like this and gets to be a cop for so long?
Click to expand...
I find it hard to believe that this guy has been a good cop all these years and then just snaps although I've said and done things I later wished I hadn't and really didn't reflect on my true feelings, especially when I was younger. It's hard to say this was a pattern for him without knowing his history.
 
#6,437
#6,437
CagleMtnVol said:
Click to expand...


Grand Vol said:
Good.

Georgia sheriff’s office posts ‘no trick-or-treat’ Halloween signs on registered sex offenders’ houses
Click to expand...

Rasputin_Vol said:
Just curious, but what if a liberal sheriff in NY/CA/MASS decided to do the same with the names and addresses of concealed carry owners?
Click to expand...

Grand Vol said:
Let's see, one is disgusting and illegal. The other is a lawful practice.

Want to play this game?
Click to expand...

Rasputin_Vol said:
I'm sure I can find plenty of liberals out here that would consider gun ownership disgusting and needing to be outlawed.

Look, I'm not saying, necessarily, that what this sheriff did is wrong. I'm just saying that we need to be very careful doing things like this because the sword can cut both ways.
Click to expand...

Not even 2 weeks after I warn Grand about this...
 
#6,439
#6,439
Grand Vol said:
Not even remotely the same.
Click to expand...

Just curious but, other than the degree to which you support the government action involved (which seemed like the initial point being made), what other differences do you see here that makes them not even remotely the same?
 
#6,440
#6,440
RockyTop85 said:
Just curious but, other than the degree to which you support the government action involved (which seemed like the initial point being made), what other differences do you see here that makes them not even remotely the same?
Click to expand...

Let's see...

The original post was made about the Sheriff putting up warning signs for known sexual predators on Halloween.

Ras is attempting to compare that with two cops going to enforce a court ruling that the person voluntarily give up their firearms. Said gun owner met the police with a gun in hand, put it down at the start, got irate, attempting to retrieve said firearm, fired at least one shot, was killed in a line of duty shooting.

As stated in the other thread, the law may suck bigly, but in this case, it seems the man in question had legitimate mental or anger issues and made stupid choices leading to his death.

Now, to what extent do I support the law? I would tend to think if a person shows themselves to be a legitimate threat to themselves or others (which appears to be apparent in this case) and after the protection order is signed (as I'm assuming all are signed by judges) then yes, the police did the right thing in attempting to confiscate the firearm in question.

What Ras was originally suggesting was that if we allowed the warning signs to be put up, why wouldn't we allow it for CCW holders or gun owners. An absurd argument.
 
#6,442
#6,442
Grand Vol said:
What Ras was originally suggesting was that if we allowed the warning signs to be put up, why wouldn't we allow it for CCW holders or gun owners. An absurd argument.
Click to expand...
No, you missed the point entirely... as usual.
First, let me again repeat what I said in the original thread... I didn't necessarily have an issue with the sheriff doing what he did with regards to sexual predators on Halloween. I'm not really a big fan of "scarlet letters" being placed on people that have served their time in prison, but in this particular case, I can stomach an exception to that. What I was trying to make you aware of, however, is that this is a very slippery slope. And it doesn't take much of a leap to go from that incident to something far more sinister that the left wing SJWs would want to do to gun owners.
 
#6,444
#6,444
Rasputin_Vol said:
Shhhh.... I was hoping to see Grand wiggle his way out of the box he so arrogantly wanted to run into.
Click to expand...

So, you're using a one time occurrence from a third party (the press) that obtained the information via another law (Freedom of Information Request) and published that list without the government's approval (not like they can control the press, that 1st Amendment thing) as proof of your "slippery slope?"

Did you wake up this morning and eat your retarded pill or are you just in your old form that likes to argue?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top