UK won 2 games last year. You can't tell me that they are returning a good OL. Their current success is due strictly to coaching, and seemingly, our lack of success is also due to coaching.
You don't have a clue what you are talking about. KY starts: 3 senior DL, a SR and a JR LB, 3 JR DBs, 1 SR DB, 1 SO DB, and one JR DL.
Their o-line consists on a JR, SR, SO, and 2 RS-FR. Oh, by the way they don't have 1 pure freshman in their 2 deep on their o-line. They also have 2 senior WRs starting, a JR RB, and a senior TE. Their QB also played for them last year as did their slot WR, both of which are SO.
You want to know how many pure freshman they have in their two deep on defense? 2. That makes for a grand total of 5 pure freshman in their 2 deep on offense and defense combined, 3 of which are freshman WRs, one of the easiest positions to play as a freshman.
You don't have a clue what you are talking about. KY starts: 3 senior DL, a SR and a JR LB, 3 JR DBs, 1 SR DB, 1 SO DB, and one JR DL.
Their o-line consists of a JR, SR, SO, and 2 RS-FR. Oh, by the way they don't have 1 pure freshman in their 2 deep on their o-line. They also have 2 senior WRs starting, a JR RB, and a senior TE. Their QB also played for them last year as did their slot WR, both of which are SO.
You want to know how many pure freshman they have in their two deep on defense? 2. That makes for a grand total of 5 pure freshman in their 2 deep on offense and defense combined, 3 of which are freshman WRs, one of the easiest positions to play as a freshman.
You don't have a clue what you are talking about. KY starts: 3 senior DL, a SR and a JR LB, 3 JR DBs, 1 SR DB, 1 SO DB, and one JR DL.
Their o-line consists of a JR, SR, SO, and 2 RS-FR. Oh, by the way they don't have 1 pure freshman in their 2 deep on their o-line. They also have 2 senior WRs starting, a JR RB, and a senior TE. Their QB also played for them last year as did their slot WR, both of which are SO.
You want to know how many pure freshman they have in their two deep on defense? 2. That makes for a grand total of 5 pure freshman in their 2 deep on offense and defense combined, 3 of which are freshman WRs, one of the easiest positions to play as a freshman.
You don't have a clue what you are talking about. KY starts: 3 senior DL, a SR and a JR LB, 3 JR DBs, 1 SR DB, 1 SO DB, and one JR DL.
Their o-line consists of a JR, SR, SO, and 2 RS-FR. Oh, by the way they don't have 1 pure freshman in their 2 deep on their o-line. They also have 2 senior WRs starting, a JR RB, and a senior TE. Their QB also played for them last year as did their slot WR, both of which are SO.
You want to know how many pure freshman they have in their two deep on defense? 2. That makes for a grand total of 5 pure freshman in their 2 deep on offense and defense combined, 3 of which are freshman WRs, one of the easiest positions to play as a freshman.
So seniority trumps talent? Theoretically, if say... Carson-Newman had seniors at every position, should they beat us? Let me clarify the point I was trying to make in my previous post. I don't care if Kentucky has a bunch of 28 year old grown men playing for them... They won 2 games last year. Even if we have "improved", UK has improved more noticeably than we have with less talent.
It's Kentucky. They are 4-1.
Kentucky will boat race us. They look OUTSTANDING in their second year under head coach Stoops. I wish we looked half as good as they do right now. This season just went down the drain. We suck again!!!! I thought we were better than what we showed today. GUESS WHAT , WE'RE NOT!!!!! DAMN'NIT WE STILL SUCK!