Velo Vol
Internets Expert
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2009
- Messages
- 37,311
- Likes
- 17,842
Former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was paid by several Russian companies before becoming an adviser to Donald Trump, according to new documents obtained and published by the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, including $11,250 by Russia's top cybersecurity firm, Kaspersky, in 2015. Flynn was also paid $11,250 by the Russian charter cargo airline Volga-Dnepr Airlines, according to the documents.
Mike Flynn was paid to work for Russia's top cybersecurity firm while he still had top-secret security clearance - Yahoo Finance
https://www.wsj.com/articles/mike-f...ian-companies-besides-rt-documents-1489683618
I've not read this entire thread, nor do I plan to, but what is the argument here? That Russia hacked and released Democrat emails, or that they somehow hacked the election itself to give Trump the victory? People voted. Trump won. Email leaks happen all the time for one reason or another. Whether from domestic hackers or foreign hackers, or disgruntled aides, or any number of sources. No one ever seems to have a problem with it unless it involves harm(or perceived harm) to their party. No amount of complaining is going to change the results of the election. Trump may flop big time, neither candidate was a good choice imo, but he is the lawfully elected POTUS.
Sounds exactly like my middle-schooler.
- Did you finish that novel?
Dad, no, my friend had a relationship emergency and I had to support them.
- OK, give me your phone and don't leave your room until you can answer all my questions about this novel.
Why are you so cruel!? I hate you!
Someone need to do this for the POTUS. Like my middle-schooler, he would thank them later. He could start with The U.S. Constitution and The Federalist Papers.
Perhaps inadvertently he mentions that the "costs of the country are out of control." I think that was a nuanced attempt at shifting the appearance of the burden from the real issue, spending.
Who am I kidding, he probably couldn't spell nuance let alone employ it in a conversation.
Look man. You may be right (you are) but I still don't need a voice of reason throwing shade on my Trump bashing.
Your Trump bashing isn't as bad as many on here. I won't name names, but some that might have the initials C86, VP, VV and others have a completely unhealthy obsession with everything the man does and making sure we are aware of said displeasure. And it's my opinion that no matter what he does, he will always be wrong.
That was kind of my intent with the sacred cows thread. I wanted to see the hypocrisy of some that claim to want a smaller government turn around and whine and moan about the cuts that are being made in the budget. Because...Trump.
Concurrently, some on here have an unhealthy obsession with everything the man does and act like a giddy fat kid in a free candy shop every time Twitter comes alive with the latest and greatest from The Donald. That can be unhealthy as well.
As I've always said, there is a careful balance to be had. I think he needs to dial back the Twitter in a big way, but I also like the direction he is going with the size/scope of the government and bringing in those not afraid to upset the apple cart on the Washington establishment.
That's an ugly thing to say to me. Clearly time to step up my game.
I mostly concur with your assessment though. I'm not convinced he's all together there, hopefully someone will step up and separate him from his twitter. I think many of the moderates who voted for him are already growing weary of his delivery. Election season is over - time to put away the twitter and lean in and make good on promises (e.g. negotiating a payment for a wall out of Mexico.)
Your Trump bashing isn't as bad as many on here. I won't name names, but some that might have the initials C86, VP, VV and others have a completely unhealthy obsession with everything the man does and making sure we are aware of said displeasure.
This isn't the only thing I have an unhealthy obsession with. I balance it out with other obsessions.
If some Americans want to put their heads in the sand because, true to form, some populares impostor in the White House wants to budget cut while robbing the country blind, then so be it.
An interesting question is, if irrefutable evidence emerges that MAGA was in cahoots with the Russian government before the election, how many Republicans will care and how many will be ¯\_(ツ_/¯?
I don't think it got posted in here, but did anyone else see that Feinstein-Grassley presser after Comey spoke to the Senate Intel Committee Wednesday?
I can't find the full video, in which Grassley also mumbles something as they depart, but they each look like they had just seen a ghost.
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/se...lent-after-trump-russia-briefings-with-comey/
