TrumPutinGate

While we await the Mueller report, a recap of Trump's history with Russia.



Classic.



So while we wait on the report that mueller has already there was no American that colluded with Russia , the twatter Guy is going to explain why there was or just point out that Trump had ties to Russia before the election in his book ? I wonder if Mueller had to buy his book and read it to find out his sources .
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
Apart from court authorized surveillance that has been disclosed, there is zero evidence of any "spying."

You can say Stalinist Stalinist Stalinist Stalinist Stalinist all you want, but you know no campaign "secrets" have ever been disclosed, apart from those related to the Russia investigation. Which, incidentally, didn't come out until after the election.

Yes, a very cunning "plan" that was to steal the election.
Still rationalizing Stalinist behavior. And just because they are idiots and sucked at it and just might get caught red handed now still doesn’t justify it.

Stand by on that “court approved surveillance” Barr has already said he intends to determine if the spying was predicated or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
D4NRNnwUwAEY9yi.png


Projection is one of his favorite devices. Also, worried bro?
 
Nothing will change, you know what's coming next. The whining about the redaction's will be just as loud and whiny as the "release the report" screams

Of course it will. That will pale in comparison to the outrage and fear after the IG report and the fisa documents are declassified..


Easy fix: release it all. Trump has the power to do so. If he is "totally exonerated," and if it was all a "phony witch hunt," then he should want us to see it all.

Unless......
 
John F. Solomon - Wikipedia

John F. Solomon is an American media executive and columnist. He is currently vice president of digital video and an opinion contributor for The Hill.[1] He is known primarily for his tenure as an executive and editor-in-chief at The Washington Times.[2] He has been accused of biased reporting in favor of conservatives, and of repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals

Until May 2018, he worked on news and investigative pieces for The Hill.[17] In October 2017, Solomon published an article on The Hill about the Uranium One controversy where he insinuated payments from Russians to the Clinton Foundation at the time when the Obama administration approved the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom.[18] Solomon's story also focused on the alleged failures of the Department of Justice to investigate and report on the controversy, suggesting a cover-up.[18] Subsequent to Solomon's reporting, the story "took off like wildfire in the right-wing media ecosystem," according to a 2018 study by scholars at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University.[18] No evidence of any quid pro quo or other wrong-doing has surfaced.[18]

In May 2018, the editor-in-chief of The Hill, announced that Solomon would become an "opinion contributor" at The Hill (he would remain executive vice president of digital video).[17]This came in the wake of reports that Solomon's colleagues at The Hill criticized Solomon's news reporting as lacking rigor and context
 
John F. Solomon - Wikipedia

John F. Solomon is an American media executive and columnist. He is currently vice president of digital video and an opinion contributor for The Hill.[1] He is known primarily for his tenure as an executive and editor-in-chief at The Washington Times.[2] He has been accused of biased reporting in favor of conservatives, and of repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals

Until May 2018, he worked on news and investigative pieces for The Hill.[17] In October 2017, Solomon published an article on The Hill about the Uranium One controversy where he insinuated payments from Russians to the Clinton Foundation at the time when the Obama administration approved the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom.[18] Solomon's story also focused on the alleged failures of the Department of Justice to investigate and report on the controversy, suggesting a cover-up.[18] Subsequent to Solomon's reporting, the story "took off like wildfire in the right-wing media ecosystem," according to a 2018 study by scholars at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University.[18] No evidence of any quid pro quo or other wrong-doing has surfaced.[18]

In May 2018, the editor-in-chief of The Hill, announced that Solomon would become an "opinion contributor" at The Hill (he would remain executive vice president of digital video).[17]This came in the wake of reports that Solomon's colleagues at The Hill criticized Solomon's news reporting as lacking rigor and context
But Buzzfeed is serious journalism and legit ...🤣🤣🤣
 
Easy fix: release it all. Trump has the power to do so. If he is "totally exonerated," and if it was all a "phony witch hunt," then he should want us to see it all.

Unless......
They can't and you know it. It's over, sorry. Move on. How about focus you alls energy into finding a descent candidate for 2020?
 
Are we really this far past the conclusion phase and people are still using "sources" to justify their idiocy?


Conclusion of what?

All I know so far is that a man who is increasingly apparent is a Trump solider, released his characterization of the conclusions. This is a man who has previously been shown in a similar position to intentionally mischaracterize such things, then work to delay the truth until nothing can be done about it.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top