TrumPutinGate

#27,851
#27,851
Mick said:
John F. Solomon - Wikipedia

John F. Solomon is an American media executive and columnist. He is currently vice president of digital video and an opinion contributor for The Hill.[1] He is known primarily for his tenure as an executive and editor-in-chief at The Washington Times.[2] He has been accused of biased reporting in favor of conservatives, and of repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals

Until May 2018, he worked on news and investigative pieces for The Hill.[17] In October 2017, Solomon published an article on The Hill about the Uranium One controversy where he insinuated payments from Russians to the Clinton Foundation at the time when the Obama administration approved the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom.[18] Solomon's story also focused on the alleged failures of the Department of Justice to investigate and report on the controversy, suggesting a cover-up.[18] Subsequent to Solomon's reporting, the story "took off like wildfire in the right-wing media ecosystem," according to a 2018 study by scholars at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University.[18] No evidence of any quid pro quo or other wrong-doing has surfaced.[18]

In May 2018, the editor-in-chief of The Hill, announced that Solomon would become an "opinion contributor" at The Hill (he would remain executive vice president of digital video).[17]This came in the wake of reports that Solomon's colleagues at The Hill criticized Solomon's news reporting as lacking rigor and context
Click to expand...
LOL. Solomon is over the target.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave, hjeagle1vol, DC_Vol and 2 others
#27,852
#27,852
Mick said:
John F. Solomon - Wikipedia

John F. Solomon is an American media executive and columnist. He is currently vice president of digital video and an opinion contributor for The Hill.[1] He is known primarily for his tenure as an executive and editor-in-chief at The Washington Times.[2] He has been accused of biased reporting in favor of conservatives, and of repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals

Until May 2018, he worked on news and investigative pieces for The Hill.[17] In October 2017, Solomon published an article on The Hill about the Uranium One controversy where he insinuated payments from Russians to the Clinton Foundation at the time when the Obama administration approved the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom.[18] Solomon's story also focused on the alleged failures of the Department of Justice to investigate and report on the controversy, suggesting a cover-up.[18] Subsequent to Solomon's reporting, the story "took off like wildfire in the right-wing media ecosystem," according to a 2018 study by scholars at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University.[18] No evidence of any quid pro quo or other wrong-doing has surfaced.[18]

In May 2018, the editor-in-chief of The Hill, announced that Solomon would become an "opinion contributor" at The Hill (he would remain executive vice president of digital video).[17]This came in the wake of reports that Solomon's colleagues at The Hill criticized Solomon's news reporting as lacking rigor and context
Click to expand...

Oh boy.

He's been right about quite a few things so far. We'll see if he's right about any of this won't we?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL69
#27,853
#27,853
lawgator1 said:
Conclusion of what?

All I know so far is that a man who is increasingly apparent is a Trump solider, released his characterization of the conclusions. This is a man who has previously been shown in a similar position to intentionally mischaracterize such things, then work to delay the truth until nothing can be done about it.
Click to expand...

LOL!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol
#27,854
#27,854
lawgator1 said:
Conclusion of what?

All I know so far is that a man who is increasingly apparent is a Trump solider, released his characterization of the conclusions. This is a man who has previously been shown in a similar position to intentionally mischaracterize such things, then work to delay the truth until nothing can be done about it.
Click to expand...
Your boy Rod disagrees
 
#27,858
#27,858
lawgator1 said:
Easy fix: release it all. Trump has the power to do so. If he is "totally exonerated," and if it was all a "phony witch hunt," then he should want us to see it all.

Unless......
Click to expand...

If you are an attorney as you claim you would know that BY LAW certain segments pertaining to sources methods and witness testimony are protected. Even if Trump said release the entire report which is bogus anyhow Barr could not do it legally, don’t worry your pals at CNN and PMSNBC will fill your head with innuendo and speculation as to what Could have happened but didn’t. 😂👍👍
 
#27,860
#27,860
FLVOL69 said:
If you are an attorney as you claim you would know that BY LAW certain segments pertaining to sources methods and witness testimony are protected. Even if Trump said release the entire report which is bogus anyhow Barr could not do it legally, don’t worry your pals at CNN and PMSNBC will fill your head with innuendo and speculation as to what Could have happened but didn’t. 😂👍👍
Click to expand...


Barr can seek an order allowing him to release the grand jury stuff. Why has he not done so?

Trump can declassify the FISA stuff. What has he not done so?
 
#27,861
#27,861
lawgator1 said:
Barr can seek an order allowing him to release the grand jury stuff. Why has he not done so?

Trump can declassify the FISA stuff. What has he not done so?
Click to expand...
You could quit screeching.

Why have you not done so?

8gE4.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hayezb and NorthDallas40
#27,868
#27,868
volinbham said:
Read the article and take exception with what he states. It's pretty simple though it takes more thought than "writer bad, I'll ignore it all"
Click to expand...
I read it and it gushed right wing conspiracy theories. I'm still curious what is the author has written which "he's been right about" that makes you substantiate his opinion as anything more than hackery.
 
#27,869
#27,869
Mick said:
I read it and it gushed right wing conspiracy theories. I'm still curious what is the author has written which "he's been right about" that makes you substantiate his opinion as anything more than hackery.
Click to expand...

Conspiracy theories like Trump colluded with Russia? Carter Page is a Russian asset?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol
#27,872
#27,872
Grand Vol said:
Conclusion you're an a-hole for not apologizing to McDad for being, well, you in the Notre Dame thread.
Click to expand...
I actually have a hard time believing LG ran McDad off. It's the offseason and this forum is a waste of time so I suspect he is just taking a break from all the same ole same ole.
 
#27,873
#27,873
Mick said:
I actually have a hard time believing LG ran McDad off. It's the offseason and this forum is a waste of time so I suspect he is just taking a break from all the same ole same ole.
Click to expand...

Oh?

McDad said:
Maybe I'm just tired of politics. Hell, i dont even vote anymore and dont care about any of a-holes in DC. I wish DC would burn instead of the ND cathedral.
We cant have a thread about a a tragic event without Loser Gator, a grown man, getting hard from an idiot trump tweet then stroking himself off until he ejaculates politics all over a thread which should be apolitical.

It's tiring. It's pedantic. And for someone who no longer cares about politics (me) and ONLY hangs out here because I've grown fond of the misfits in this forum, it corrupts the small pleasure i get from participating.

Im gonna take a break. Y'all be nice to each other. Those of you who have my cell, holla at your boy if i can do anything for you.

Peace, brethren and sisteren.
Click to expand...
 
#27,874
#27,874
Grand Vol said:
Oh?
Click to expand...
McDad said:
Maybe I'm just tired of politics. Hell, i dont even vote anymore and dont care about any of a-holes in DC. I wish DC would burn instead of the ND cathedral.
We cant have a thread about a a tragic event without Loser Gator, a grown man, getting hard from an idiot trump tweet then stroking himself off until he ejaculates politics all over a thread which should be apolitical.

It's tiring. It's pedantic. And for someone who no longer cares about politics (me) and ONLY hangs out here because I've grown fond of the misfits in this forum, it corrupts the small pleasure i get from participating.

Im gonna take a break. Y'all be nice to each other. Those of you who have my cell, holla at your boy if i can do anything for you.

Peace, brethren and sisteren.
Click to expand...

Yes I have a hard time believing LG ran him off. McDad took a break about this time last year if I remember correctly. If it was just a few posters, I'm sure McDad would use the ignore function. McDad is not a snowflake and if you take away his disdain for LG comment, It would be hard to argue with his reasoning.
 
#27,875
#27,875
volinbham said:
Read the article and take exception with what he states. It's pretty simple though it takes more thought than "writer bad, I'll ignore it all"
Click to expand...
Mick will never believe anything that paints his Dem party in a bad light, or that makes Trump look like he was the victim of an attempted coup. Never, ever.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top