TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#10,651
#10,651
BowlBrother85 said:
He was never specific one way or the other. He made a blanket statement that he agreed with the conclusion of the intelligence community. One of their conclusions was that Russia was responsible for the hacking of the DNC. You are parsing a statement to meet the needs of your narrative... which borders on dishonesty.
Click to expand...

I have no narrative. You do. And I'm questioning the way you're trying to further it.

Trump specifically stated that he agreed with the IC's opinion that Russia tried to meddle in our elections. That is what he said. I've watched several clips of it. That in no way stated any agreement on the specificity of DNC hacks.

Combine that with his most recent release that he doesn't trust former IC people--only present and future--and it's clear that you're forcing more specificity than his statements allow.

You're pressing it from pure assumption and assertion.

That's my point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#10,652
#10,652
BowlBrother85 said:
He was never specific one way or the other. He made a blanket statement that he agreed with the conclusion of the intelligence community. One of their conclusions was that Russia was responsible for the hacking of the DNC. You are parsing a statement to meet the needs of your narrative... which borders on dishonesty.
Click to expand...

Irony ...
 
#10,653
#10,653
TennTom said:
HIS own Department of Justice indicted 12 Russians for hacking the DNC on the basis of HIS numerous intelligence agencies. Are you saying there's a huge disconnect between he and his agencies that he's supposed to be leading?
Click to expand...

You're serious with this? Come on. Just admit to being a troll.
 
#10,654
#10,654
TennTom said:
HIS own Department of Justice indicted 12 Russians for hacking the DNC on the basis of HIS numerous intelligence agencies. Are you saying there's a huge disconnect between he and his agencies that he's supposed to be leading?
Click to expand...

Lol. HIS DOJ hasn’t indicted any of those Russians. HIS DOJ knows it’s a waste of time and pure theater.
 
#10,655
#10,655
NorthDallas40 said:
Lol. HIS DOJ hasn’t indicted any of those Russians. HIS DOJ knows it’s a waste of time and pure theater.
Click to expand...

lol

That post was so ridiculous, I literally covered by rear by googling to see if anyone besides Mueller the Trump-hunter had indicted 12 Russians for hacking the DNC.

That HAD to be a joke.
 
#10,657
#10,657
Orange_Crush said:
I have no narrative. You do. And I'm questioning the way you're trying to further it.

Trump specifically stated that he agreed with the IC's opinion that Russia tried to meddle in our elections. That is what he said. I've watched several clips of it. That in no way stated any agreement on the specificity of DNC hacks.

Combine that with his most recent release that he doesn't trust former IC people--only present and future--and it's clear that you're forcing more specificity than his statements allow.

You're pressing it from pure assumption and assertion.

That's my point.
Click to expand...

Dan Coats is presently the DNI. His conclusion is that Russia hacked the DNC. Trump agreed with his assessment. End/
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,658
#10,658
BowlBrother85 said:
Dan Coats is presently the DNI. His conclusion is that Russia hacked the DNC. Trump agreed with his assessment. End/
Click to expand...


You keep trying to end the discussion based on ignoring points made and reaffirming what's in question. Weak, lazy, and the actions of someone who knows they've lost a discussion.


Have a nice evening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#10,659
#10,659
Orange_Crush said:
I have no narrative. You do. And I'm questioning the way you're trying to further it.

Trump specifically stated that he agreed with the IC's opinion that Russia tried to meddle in our elections. That is what he said. I've watched several clips of it. That in no way stated any agreement on the specificity of DNC hacks.

Combine that with his most recent release that he doesn't trust former IC people--only present and future--and it's clear that you're forcing more specificity than his statements allow.

You're pressing it from pure assumption and assertion.

That's my point.
Click to expand...


You never have a point. Your line of questioning is pointless. Just another round of pointless questions and arguements for the sake of arguement from OC
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10,661
#10,661
Trump does what he does best, he trolls the left into a tailspin. He’s undoing what that big eared moron did for 8 years and the left hates him.

Where’s he nowadays? Ayers writing another book about his socialist father again?
 
#10,662
#10,662
Russia really does love its redheaded spies. This is Maria Katasonova Marine Le Pen's Russian connection in France.
 

Attachments

  • Dil9H0wXkAAOkTx.jpg
    Dil9H0wXkAAOkTx.jpg
    63 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10,666
#10,666
carlos86 said:
Russia really does love its redheaded spies. This is Maria Katasonova Marine Le Pen's Russian connection in France.
Click to expand...

I'll wait for the triggering that is about to commence.

French-election-2017-Maria-Katasonova-Russian-Donald-Trump-Putin-prediction-930154.jpg
 
#10,670
#10,670
BowlBrother85 said:
He was never specific one way or the other. He made a blanket statement that he agreed with the conclusion of the intelligence community. One of their conclusions was that Russia was responsible for the hacking of the DNC. You are parsing a statement to meet the needs of your narrative... which borders on dishonesty.
Click to expand...

Little bit of history, and coincidences...

FISA Abuse, Four Coincidences & Questions About the DNC Server

As I noted in the article:

The timing between Admiral Rogers’ discovery of outside contractors and the sudden problems with the DNC Servers appears far too coincidental.

Coincidence Number One:

July 20, 2015 – The Yates Memorandum is issued. It bars Inspector General Oversight of information collected by the DOJ & FBI under Title III.
July 27, 2015 – The DNC says a Russian cyberattack began – only weeks after Trump announced his candidacy for President of the United States.

Coincidence Number Two:

November 2015 – the FBI notified the DNC one of the DNC’s computers was now transmitting information to Russia.
November 2015-April 2016 – The FBI and DOJ’s National Security Division (NSD) used private contractors to access raw FISA information.

Coincidence Number Three:

March 9, 2016 – NSA Director Rogers became aware of improper access to raw FISA data.
March 9 2016 – Page sends text referencing “HUGE f-up”.
March 10, 2016 – the first phishing attempts were made on the Clinton Campaign.
Late March 2016 – FBI Agents visited the Clinton Campaign Headquarters in Brooklyn.

Coincidence Number Four:

April 18 2016 – Rogers shut down FBI/NSD contractor access to the FISA Search System.
April 18, 2016 – Russia launched a second phase of its cyberattack on DNC servers located in Virginia and Washington DC.

I generally do not believe in coincidences.

Exactly what was on those DNC Servers that involved the need for such secrecy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,672
#10,672
BowlBrother85 said:
Many liberals agree (I sure do) that she was an atrocious candidate. This is true both from the standpoint of her character and integrity, as well as her very inconsistent positions on important policies from her brief time in the Senate.

However, most liberals also know that Hillary being a poor candidate and Russian interference in the 2016 election campaign are not mutually exclusive. The conservatives here seem to want to make it a question of one or the other.
Click to expand...

I will never tire of the Democrats bellyaching after losing in 2016 (to a reality TV star who is a cheeto colored dullard). It will never get old.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#10,673
#10,673
BowlBrother85 said:
Many liberals agree (I sure do) that she was an atrocious candidate. This is true both from the standpoint of her character and integrity, as well as her very inconsistent positions on important policies from her brief time in the Senate.
Click to expand...

And yet, you and the liberal never questioned the DNC promoting her above all others, ignored the fact the DNC leadership rigged the election in her favor and got all sorts of butthurt when your chosen one lost the election.

Scratch that, you STILL won't question their methods in racing to the extreme left on candidates, virtually guaranteeing Trump term #2. At what point do you come to the realization you're doing it to yourselves?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#10,674
#10,674
TennTom said:
HIS own Department of Justice indicted 12 Russians for hacking the DNC on the basis of HIS numerous intelligence agencies. Are you saying there's a huge disconnect between he and his agencies that he's supposed to be leading?
Click to expand...
Interesting choice of words from Gowdy. Republican's balls are finally descending. Let's hope it's a pattern.

"The evidence is overwhelming," Gowdy said. "It can be proven beyond any evidentiary burden that Russia is not our friend and they tried to attack us in 2016. So the President either needs to rely on the people that he has chosen to advise him, or those advisers need to reevaluate whether or not they can serve in this administration. But the disconnect cannot continue. The evidence is overwhelming, and the President needs to say that and act like it."
Click to expand...

Trey Gowdy: 'Disconnect cannot continue' between Trump and intelligence community - CNNPolitics
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,675
#10,675
ajvol01 said:
The fact that liberals honestly believe American voters were influenced to change their votes based on this shows exactly how gullible and biased they are.



Absurd.
Click to expand...

Also remember that a lot of them were smart enough to vote for Obama in 2012 but by 2016 were racist morons who were swayed by Facebook memes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top