TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#10,702
#10,702
Mick said:
Would it change your opinion if they contract crowdstrike to do just that. Sounds like you are trying to convict them of a crime. Are you saying they committed a crime? Back up your claim or STFU.
Click to expand...

Kiss my tail with your STFU schtick Micky.

Crowdstrike took the image and gave it to the FBI. Comey stated it. I’ve linked that statement before. As far as I’m concerned it’s been proven.

Crowdstrike was employed by the DNC not the FBI.

What I’m stating is that they totally mailed in the effort to secure a first hand image of the servers. By Comey’s own testimony it was not “best practice”.

So suck it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#10,703
#10,703
NorthDallas40 said:
Kiss my tail with your STFU schtick Micky.

Crowdstrike took the image and gave it to the FBI. Comey stated it. I’ve linked that statement before. As far as I’m concerned it’s been proven.

Crowdstrike was employed by the DNC not the FBI.

What I’m stating is that they totally mailed in the effort to secure a first hand image of the servers. By Comey’s own testimony it was not “best practice”.

So suck it!
Click to expand...

"Comey said"? I though he was lying POS that should be in jail but carry on.
 
#10,705
#10,705
Mick said:
What would that tell you different? Just curious why do you and others think its not good enough.
Click to expand...

It get’s pretty complex...it could all be cleaner if the DNC simply turned over their hard drives.

It’s like a murder weapon, you wanna inspect it, not look at an image of it. It’s not the #1 option, it’s just not the FBI norm to not inspect the hard drive when you are investigating a case of this magnitude. Just fishy is all, or shall we say not your 1st choice.

[twitter]1019169296151298048[/twitter]

Your buddy explains it fully: July 18, 2018: Ep. 765 What is the Anti Trump Crowd Hiding? – Dan Bongino
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#10,707
#10,707
Vol0725 said:
It get’s pretty complex...it could all be cleaner if the DNC simply turned over their hard drives.

It’s like a murder weapon, you wanna inspect it, not look at an image of it. It’s not the #1 option, it’s just not the FBI norm to not inspect the hard drive when you are investigating a case of this magnitude. Just fishy is all, or shall we say not your 1st choice.

[twitter]1019169296151298048[/twitter]

Your buddy explains it fully: July 18, 2018: Ep. 765 What is the Anti Trump Crowd Hiding? – Dan Bongino
Click to expand...

That is hillarious. What is a sec18 felony?
 
#10,713
#10,713
Falsifying an image is hard. Just ask Awan.

A secret server is behind law enforcement’s decision to ban a former IT aide to Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz from the House network.

Now-indicted former congressional IT aide Imran Awan allegedly routed data from numerous House Democrats to a secret server. Police grew suspicious and requested a copy of the server early this year, but they were provided with an elaborate falsified image designed to hide the massive violations. The falsified image is what ultimately triggered their ban from the House network Feb. 2, according to a senior House official with direct knowledge of the investigation.
 
#10,714
#10,714
McDad said:
I would like you to decode, please.
Click to expand...

He’s eluding to the image being tampered with.

Slack space or slack data is previously occupied drive segments that have been freed up for reuse by the file allocation system. Two file allocation systems are referenced. FAT32 and NTFS. Of the two NTFS is much more accommodating and by moving the NTFS partition data into a FAT32 file system you are going to truncate a bunch of the “slack data”.

Basically it’s destroying previously allocated drive sectors due to the imaging method used. That is what I inferred anyway. And it would be rookie at best if they used a FAT32 partition to image an NTFS drive. It would shred the really long file names.

That’s my take. If anybody more versed sees an error please correct it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#10,719
#10,719
NorthDallas40 said:
He’s eluding to the image being tampered with.

Slack space or slack data is previously occupied drive segments that have been freed up for reuse by the file allocation system. Two file allocation systems are referenced. FAT32 and NTFS. Of the two NTFS is much more accommodating and by moving the NTFS partition data into a FAT32 file system you are going to truncate a bunch of the “slack data”.

Basically it’s destroying previously allocated drive sectors due to the imaging method used. That is what I inferred anyway. And it would be rookie at best if they used a FAT32 partition to image an NTFS drive. It would shred the really long file names.

That’s my take. If anybody more versed sees an error please correct it.
Click to expand...
Alluding......with a tip of the hat to McDad.
 
#10,724
#10,724
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top