TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#10,601
#10,601
1972 Grad said:
This is the day that Luther predicted Trump would leave the White House. Anybody know what time they will come and remove the orange moron? There are less than 14 hours to go today.
Click to expand...
All.day.long.


:popcorn:

Actually I am willing to give him an extension to Monday which is my birthday. I want the present of watching Mr Trump in handcuffs doing the perp walk. Obvious sarcasm, but blue for those challenged nonetheless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#10,602
#10,602
37L1 said:
Hey Luther,

Guess what day it is?

guess-what-day-it-is-its-trump-day-12482718.png
Click to expand...

This is great
 
#10,606
#10,606
TennTom said:
Another internet troll farm for the gullible.



American Conservatives Played A Secret Role In The Macedonian Fake News Boom Ahead Of 2016
Click to expand...

The fact that liberals honestly believe American voters were influenced to change their votes based on this shows exactly how gullible and biased they are.

A week before Election Day in 2016, BuzzFeed News revealed that young men and teens in Veles were running over a hundred websites that pumped out often false viral stories that supported Donald Trump.

Media outlets from around the world descended upon Veles to tell the story of how the so-called fake news teens — many of whom had a shaky understanding of English — made large sums of money from digital ads shown next to their misleading stories about US politics.
Click to expand...

Absurd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,611
#10,611
NorthDallas40 said:
It simply isn’t possible that Hillary was a horrible candidate. It has to be coersion by Russian troll farms!

Am I doing it right?
Click to expand...
A lot of undecided voters right before the election due to both candidates sucking. Yes, a barrage of fake negative news can influence people. Quit being an AJ.
Remember, 77,000 votes in 3 states decided the election.
 
#10,612
#10,612
TennTom said:
A lot of undecided voters right before the election due to both candidates sucking. Yes, a barrage of fake negative news can influence people. Quit being an AJ.
Remember, 77,000 votes in 3 states decided the election.
Click to expand...

Yet your party never acknowledges what 90% negative mainstream media coverage of Trump did to influence people.

The double standard is undeniable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,613
#10,613
NorthDallas40 said:
It simply isn’t possible that Hillary was a horrible candidate. It has to be coersion by Russian troll farms!

Am I doing it right?
Click to expand...

Many liberals agree (I sure do) that she was an atrocious candidate. This is true both from the standpoint of her character and integrity, as well as her very inconsistent positions on important policies from her brief time in the Senate.

However, most liberals also know that Hillary being a poor candidate and Russian interference in the 2016 election campaign are not mutually exclusive. The conservatives here seem to want to make it a question of one or the other.
 
#10,614
#10,614
BowlBrother85 said:
Many liberals agree (I sure do) that she was an atrocious candidate. This is true both from the standpoint of her character and integrity, as well as her very inconsistent positions on important policies from her brief time in the Senate.

However, most liberals also know that Hillary being a poor candidate and Russian interference in the 2016 election campaign are not mutually exclusive. The conservatives here seem to want to make it a question of one or the other.
Click to expand...

We know and can prove everything you listed plus some on hillary.
But there is no evidence of collusion or interference by the Russian government.
 
#10,617
#10,617
TennTom said:
A lot of undecided voters right before the election due to both candidates sucking. Yes, a barrage of fake negative news can influence people. Quit being an AJ.
Remember, 77,000 votes in 3 states decided the election.
Click to expand...

Maybe she should have bothered to campaign in a few more states she blew off? It was her own damn fault and people generally dislike her. Stop acting like you fools didn’t put the worst candidate in the modern era up and then sat by while she also sat on her ass and didn’t campaign. You rigged your primary not the general election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,618
#10,618
BowlBrother85 said:
Many liberals agree (I sure do) that she was an atrocious candidate. This is true both from the standpoint of her character and integrity, as well as her very inconsistent positions on important policies from her brief time in the Senate.

However, most liberals also know that Hillary being a poor candidate and Russian interference in the 2016 election campaign are not mutually exclusive. The conservatives here seem to want to make it a question of one or the other.
Click to expand...

The indictments you guys keep cheat thumping on as validation even stated there is no evidence the interference impacted the election? You can’t have it both ways.
 
Last edited:
#10,619
#10,619
1972 Grad said:
Women are easily led? That hasn't been my experience. If I wanted my wife to vote for Trump, I would have to tell her to vote for Hillary.
Click to expand...

No crap. Mine questions the answer to the time of day if she asks me what time it is and I answer. That’s why when I heard her say that crap I laughed out loud.
 
#10,620
#10,620
Obsessed said:
Prove it then...
Click to expand...

I don't have to anymore. Trump just admitted that he agreed with the conclusion of the intelligence community. Both Mike Pompeo (Trump's former CIA Director) and Dan Coats (Trump's appointed DNI) are on record saying that Russia hacked the DNC in 2016. They also agree that this couldn't have happened without the consent (or most likely been under the direction) of Vladimir Putin. That... is what Trump just (begrudgingly) agreed with.

Wake up and smell the coffee. Whether you like it or not ... last week did actually happen.
 
#10,621
#10,621
NorthDallas40 said:
The indictments you guys keep cheat thumping on as validation even stated there is no evidence the interference impacted the election? You can’t have it both ways.
Click to expand...

Where did I say that it did? That has nothing to do with the fact that Russia was responsible for hacking the DNC in 2016.
 
#10,622
#10,622
BowlBrother85 said:
I don't have to anymore. Trump just admitted that he agreed with the conclusion of the intelligence community. Both Mike Pompeo (Trump's former CIA Director) and Dan Coats (Trump's appointed DNI) are on record saying that Russia hacked the DNC in 2016. They also agree that this couldn't have happened without the consent (or most likely been under the direction) of Vladimir Putin. That... is what Trump just (begrudgingly) agreed with.



Wake up and smell the coffee. Whether you like it or not ... last week did actually happen.
Click to expand...

Russians. Not Russia.

Learn the difference. And ftr, they haven’t been proven guilty.
 
#10,624
#10,624
BowlBrother85 said:
Where did I say that it did? That has nothing to do with the fact that Russia was responsible for hacking the DNC in 2016.
Click to expand...

You’re playing luth’s game now way too much. “That isn’t what I said. Any reasonable and rationale person can tell that.”

BowlBrother85 said:
Many liberals agree (I sure do) that she was an atrocious candidate. This is true both from the standpoint of her character and integrity, as well as her very inconsistent positions on important policies from her brief time in the Senate.

However, most liberals also know that Hillary being a poor candidate and Russian interference in the 2016 election campaign are not mutually exclusive. The conservatives here seem to want to make it a question of one or the other.
Click to expand...

And then you change the topic when called on your BS. Again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top