Well, you whined I didn't make contributions to this thread.
Questioning the worth of your post certainly ≠ whining. In fact, your response...
I make plenty of good contributions.
You just ignore them like the child you are.
Is way closer to what I'd consider whining.
So I contributed and called you out on your thinly veiled hints of violence.
Yeah... My post were just begging for violence.
That's very encouraging to me. Not cause I want anyone to get hurt but because once that happens maybe they'll start leaving people the f*** alone.
And trust me... There's definitely a way to stop it. Now I'd love to see that happen without anybody getting as much as a stubbed toe. Unfortunately, politely asking fascist to not be fascist doesn't exactly have a strong track record throughout history. Unfortunately, once society has officially had enough there will most likely be quite a few LEO who have to learn that the hard way.
Here's where I state, for the 2nd time, that a non-violent resolution would be preferable.
At no point did I never say anything about killing anyone. I'm simply talking about starting to forcibly defend ourselves against an aggressor. What all it takes to defend ourselves would be totally up to the initial aggressor. Like I said in my post (that is if you wanna talk about the things I actually did said), I'd love it if we could get there without anyone stubbing a toe. I just assume if freedom is to ever be seen, it'll take a hell of a lot more than that. What that level of aggression is? When it happens (like I said may be tomorrow, may be 30 years, hell it may never happen) the amount of force it takes to get there will be totally up them.
And of course, you are in full backtrack mode because "that's not what I meant!
If pointing out that you simply made a bunch of s*** up is backtracking, then I'm guilty as charged. Otherwise I stand by everything I said and made absolutely no mention to the contrary.
Boo hoo, GV is being mean by interpreting my vague posts!
This appears to be one of your go-tos. I've done nothing that would even closely resemble whining, yet this is the second time (in this particular discussion you've done a dozen times in the past) you've thrown that one out there. I starting to wonder if you're maybe confused as to what it means.
Sorry dude, but your wording shouldn't have been that ambiguous if that's not what you "really" meant. But I'll stand by my original interpretation of what you said.
Nothing ambiguous about what I said. Police are losing support by the minute. Both individuals and and groups of bystanders are starting to defend themselves against police aggression and I'm encouraged by it. I've said several times more people should've used
defensive violence to defend themselves against LE and though it should be an absolute last resort that includes putting half a magazine center-mass if they leave you no other option. Basically self defense only people lose their ability to critically think when the aggressor is a cop.
You then said that I was promoting murder and wanted a revolution. I have 3 little kids. A revolution is quite literally one of the last things I want to see.
Now... It doesn't hurt my feelings. I'm not "whining" and don't think you're "mean". But if you make a post packed full of exaggerations and strawmans, don't be surprised when it gets pointed out.
Oh, and I wouldn't be all that concerned about likes or the simpletons that like my posts. I mean, they like yours so there's no accounting for taste or intelligence.
I have this crazy feeling that it's not the same people liking both our posts. It's actually really simple to account for taste and intelligence. The people who like mine are smart and have good taste and the people who like yours are stupid and have bad taste**.
*I feel it's kinda stupid this even needs to be said, but that last comment was made in jest. I feel like that's obvious but I learned recently (after getting cussed out by my sister) my jokes/sarcasm are often not as obvious as I think they are.
