To Protect and to Serve II

Definitely needs to be better trained but it’s hard to fault a guy who’s job is to stop people from running onto the floor who stopped someone from running onto the floor.

Put your credentials where they can be seen and you’re not stopped. After you are stopped show your credentials. Instead of the “do you know who I am?!?!” Approach. Clearly the cop didn’t have a clue who he was or he wouldn’t have stopped him.
This cop is undeniably a POS. He saw an opportunity for a lawsuit and got caught red handed being the scam artist he is. Maybe one of the resident bootlickers can explain why someone with a history of fraud would even sniff a job as a cop.

Deputy who sued Toronto Raptors president after altercation was convicted of insurance fraud
 
This cop is undeniably a POS. He saw an opportunity for a lawsuit and got caught red handed being the scam artist he is. Maybe one of the resident bootlickers can explain why someone with a history of fraud would even sniff a job as a cop.

Deputy who sued Toronto Raptors president after altercation was convicted of insurance fraud

We have a tremendous oversight problem with in most police departments. I heard a story yesterday about Chattanooga doing the right thing when chief Roddy took over. I’m not going to repeat it till I confirm it’s true.
If it’s true then the sad fact is without this chief it would still be happening.
 
Asking an actual question because I don't know. After reading it sounds good, is the policy working?

I saw that last night and then I re-read everything again a few moments ago. With the exception of the first item, everything else sounds reasonable. But the first item on the list has me scratching my head a bit. It seems to address mental health, Latino outreach and "broken windows" policing. My understanding of broken windows policing is an aggressive approach to minor infractions.
OK, I wasn't crazy. I had no idea WTF LatinX was until I saw this video.

 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
Only states they cannot work there in state. I do know that a lot of cops who are fired at one town/city go on to work at others quite often.
That shouldn't ever happen if the hiring agency does due diligence in its background checks.

Why would any Department Head take on that liability that's just waiting to happen? Makes no sense to me, none.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
I get what these Sheriff's, Chiefs of Police, State Trooper Superintendents and what not are saying, and I agree. But it's just grandstanding for their voters, IMO. The Use of Force Continuum is pretty much the same nationwide. While some jurisdictions...Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis, to name a few...have been neutered by their elected and/or appointed leaders, the main reason this BLM/Antifa violence has not spread nationwide is because, for the most part, they know what will happen when the first rock / frozen water bottle / poop bag / paint bag / projectile hits a peace officer.

Down my way, Atlanta and Jacksonville are good examples of low tolerance. Charlotte? marcus?

And I have no idea where or when, but if this BS keeps up, some place is going to serve as "Example A".

Maybe "Commander Red" will be there to lead the charge....;)
 

Advertisement



Back
Top