g8terh8ter_eric
No Disassemble!
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2005
- Messages
- 26,983
- Likes
- 686
So boosters can't go to HS football games? Compliance is going to have their hands full with that one.
Best thing to do as a fan is enjoy the game. If the kid approaches you and wants to say hey how are you, do it.
But DO NOT talk about how great Tennessee is or anything of that nature if he is a recruit. Or offer any anything free, etc. If the kids initiate the contact with a fan, than more then likely it never amounts to anything. And as long as you aren't paying the kid or buying him dinner, then you won't have any problems.
Here's the easiest way to NOT commit a violation....
If you think that something you are about to do can be shown to do something that can be detrimental to recruiting, even in the slightest or even questionable, DON'T FREAKING DO IT. That's as simple as I can put it.
The one problem is, as raider has mentioned, that there are so many rules. Rules are broken all the time, with the overwhelming majority happening unknowingly or without any benefit to the athlete or university. Lord only knows how many I committed in a 4 year span.
Oh wait, ncaa trolls may be reading this. :ermm:
How do you get around that all kinds of our players text and communicate with recruits on facebook, myspace, etc. and this somehow does not violate NCAA rules, but if a hostess does it, it somehow does. Are players not considered "representatives of the University" just as hostesses are?
I think that if you're 18 yrs old, then you shouldn't be governed as to what you can and can't do, however; I can understand having policies in place for minors. In either case, parents are usually involved in those decisions anyways. Why can't they let athletes make their own decisions if they are of age??? I mean, they should be smart enough to figure out where they want to play at some point right?
All these rules would make me not want to play at all, but then again I spent my time studying and in the stands. Maybe it's just me. Does anyone else think it's funny that the majority of the athletes being questioned are in this hellwhole of a state....Florida? (i live here):mega_shok:
One of the rules that was always hammered home was about dating. If a person was going to date an athlete, they were not allowed at any time to buy dinner for the athlete. Good on the wallet though.
Maybe, if they aren't involved in anyway or going to try and influence a recruits decision. Ever wonder why typically ONLY the coaches go to game and represent the university during eval and contact periods?? This is why.
Yup. My office says we aren't even allowed to be with athletes outside of a university function. This was the same way when I was a student. So many dang rules...
I understand once you are employed, but not as much as when you are a student.
Students are in the same peer group and given their affiliation, they will spend most of their time around other student workers and athletes. It is only natural that some will become friends and others become more than that much like athletes of different sports do.
The bolded part is huge. There is some lawyers trying to challenge the validity of NLIs now. If a kid signs them before they are 18, he or she could legally back out of it if they can prove the rule you mentioned in the court of law. But in the NCAA, that rule states it is a binding agreement. Let's say Bryce Brown had signed with Tennessee (before 18) then a few months later he wanted to sign elsewhere but Tennessee said no. In the NCAA eyes, it's legally binding, in the court of law, he might be able to break the contract and play at Alabama.
This will be a major issue the NCAA must work out next year.
If anything comes of this is that the hostesses will not be allowed to associate with the football program or athletics in general I don't see any major violations anywhere...this is a case of coaches trying to knock lane down while they have the chance they see what he is building and are trying to stop it...we call those people haters