BigOrangeD
Got Bitcoin?
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2010
- Messages
- 27,102
- Likes
- 21,182
1. I’m not on the left.
2. The multi-level hypocrisy of this post is epic. 10/10. Will read again.
I asked you what you propose that would stop the mass shootings.
You deem it as a stupid question because you can't answer it. That's something a 6 year old does. Yet you expect others to solve this problem because why? They are smarter than you?
Lets see if you have anything.
What would you suggest "both sides are going to have to give" to "stop the mass shootings"?
On this stuff you and I agree. It amazes me how many smart people fall for crap on the internet.
Which is kinda funny in itself. Because on the other end of the spectrum. Other hate groups get to spew their ignorance on FB, Twitter, Snapchat, Intagram, etc. with out any form of bans or mass public outrage. It's accepted and a lot of the time is boosted. But, saying ONLY white people can be racist is also the norm these days, so..
protesters-shout-death-threats-outside-mitch-mcconnells-home
The used FB Live to broadcast. Social justice is exempt from any decorum or law and only thing that matters is the end result.
Non white ethnicities or races get to hide behind their differences and are not subject to any criticism.
The ole classic "one up" in an attempt to stop the conversation before it gets into a territory one doesn't like. Figured you'd wait a little longer before pulling this one out of your old bag of tricks..Tell that to thehispanicskillers and rapers that were mowed down in Wallyworld.
Heck, their star new politician called for violence last week, and not one Democrat on this board has condemned it.protesters-shout-death-threats-outside-mitch-mcconnells-home
The used FB Live to broadcast. Social justice is exempt from any decorum or law and only thing that matters is the end result.
Non white ethnicities or races get to hide behind their differences and are not subject to any criticism.
Who wants to "get you"? Little bit paranoid are we? Your rejoinder was, to be frank, a bit pathetic. Perhaps, just perhaps, I was giving you more credit than I should have, thinking you just might have some good ideas about solving what appears to be a very difficult problem. You pretty much alluded that there was a solution by declaring each "side" had to give up something to "stop mass shootings." I thought you might have some idea what those "somethings" might be.You deemed my answer a stupid because you didn't like it. That's something a 5 year old does. Rational people understand that there's no one answer or solution to change the culture of will and ease of people acquiring the tools they implement to kill enmass. I'm sure you thought you'd be clever enough to paint me into a corner, but you failed to account for the fact that I'm not riding and dying with either 'side'.
I recognize there's a problem and the solution won't be easy or convenient, do you?
Also, it appears your butthurt dislike for me is getting in the way of rational thought and you're coming off as a bit of try hard. You'll get me one day, today is not that day.
The ole classic "one up" in an attempt to stop the conversation before it gets into a territory one doesn't like. Figured you'd wait a little longer before pulling this one out of your old bag of tricks..
It has been pointed out and posted dozens of times the left has espoused death threats and excessive rhetoric and hardly a whimper of pushback. You ever think the shooter may of been pushed over the edge because of this rhetoric?Tell that to thehispanicskillers and rapers that were mowed down in Wallyworld.
Who wants to "get you"? Little bit paranoid are we? Your rejoinder was, to be frank, a bit pathetic. Perhaps, just perhaps, I was giving you more credit than I should have, thinking you just might have some good ideas about solving what appears to be a very difficult problem. You pretty much alluded that there was a solution by declaring each "side" had to give up something to "stop mass shootings." I thought you might have some idea what those "somethings" might be.
Like I said, how naive of me, you were just stirring feces, as usual.
Edit: I don't dislike you.
I don't have disdain either. I find you fairly intelligent and entertaining until you devolve into personal insults and even they, sometimes, are entertaining.
Hope that doesn't displease you.
That's the issue though. The Town square is a public place. An internet site is a privately owned entity equivalent to a business on the square.One could argue it's the modern day town square. The town square designation is an area of free speech, legally speaking. But the internet is not yet fully defined as that yet.
