Pepe_Silvia
#mikehawk
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 23,732
- Likes
- 48,335
A. Buy flood insurance.
Frankly, I'd consider taxing rifled ammunition to the point of absurdity and regulate the sale of powder for the home reloaders.
Eh, I don't think that'd last long as getting a tax on components might be easier in some ways than taxing ammunition itself. I say that because the "right" to ammunition is inseparable from the RKBA. Any remotely onerous price burden put on ammunition would directly impact one's 2A rights as a firearm without ammo is just an expensive club.
And if you have been reading my posts, you would know HIPAA is the roadblock there. Are you advocating doing away with that privacy?
Would Canadian gun laws have stopped America’s worst mass shooters?Why doesn't Canada have this problem with mass shootings?
The bolded part is exactly how those on the right feel about "white nationalists" which has historically been a term associated with the white supremacy-master race idiots.
The fact that the left has now co-opted that terminology to broad stroke paint the President and his supporters in order to push their political agenda is duplicitous and disgusting.
First, medical information is not included in the NICS. Second, what do you want to research, why they're crazy? If it was determined they're crazy because of hate speech, where you going to go from there?No, I'm advocating research. I'm also advocating that all .gov agencies and departments tasked with reporting to NICS do so and report timely. The biggest flaw with background checks is that the information isn't reported to NICS.
The shooter couldn't be bothered to make that distinction. Neither can any of the white nationalists.
I think a better question is why doesn't Switzerland have them. Really high gun ownership rate (not relative to the US, but much much higher than their European neighbors), a right to own firearms in their federal law. Yet no mass shootings and basically no gun crime.
First, medical information is not included in the NICS. Second, what do you want to research, why they're crazy? If it was determined they're crazy because of hate speech, where you going to go from there?
I have said many times that the root causes, the actual reason(s) these people decide to commit these acts needs to be studied to include what if any medications they are or have been taking. What if any similarities in backgrounds did the shooters have. We start there and work to find a solution to stop the why because as long as there are people who want to commit mass murder they will find an instrument to do so. Restricting types of guns solves nothing.
Glad you finally get it.
The shooters see no difference and shoot everyone. Now if you could just see them as equals and stop distinguishing between them and you.
I stopped reading at “brown people “. Your racist rants don’t deserve to be read Or quoted
I'd actually addressed this earlier in the thread but it's been discussed before.
Could there be "a" tax on ammunition? Possibly, but as stated above as long as firearms fall under the protection of being a Right then it's literally impossible to functionally separate ammunition from the equation. I don't see how there wouldn't be a point such taxation wouldn't be unconstitutional.
The research is there that points to hate speech and extremism. What more do you want to research? Are you familiar with the methodology the Nazi party used to disparage the Jews?I have said many times that the root causes, the actual reason(s) these people decide to commit these acts needs to be studied to include what if any medications they are or have been taking. What if any similarities in backgrounds did the shooters have. We start there and work to find a solution to stop the why because as long as there are people who want to commit mass murder they will find an instrument to do so. Restricting types of guns solves nothing.
