Shooting in El Paso

One could argue it's the modern day town square. The town square designation is an area of free speech, legally speaking. But the internet is not yet fully defined as that yet.
But doing it in the town square puts a name and face behind the crazy and the hatred. Doing it as anonymous online is much different
 
If we're keeping score, you ad homed right out of the gate by calling me mealy mouthed. Probably should refrain from whining about devolving into personal insults right after you hurl the first turd.
And there he is.

Your answer was what I called it. If you think that calls you "mealy mouthed" well, then you are in your own mind. Perhaps I should factor in your precious sensibilities and just called it a "dodge". Would that then make you a Dodger?

Feeling better now, snookums?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
You're clearly not bright enough to understand the logical fallacy you're committing, you're conflating a drunk driving death with intentional mass homicide in a debate about using firearms. If you can't wrap your head around this after it's been spelled out for you, then we're done here.
There you go resorting to insults. Classic example of losing your argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
That's the issue though. The Town square is a public place. An internet site is a privately owned entity equivalent to a business on the square.

I just noticed your avatar and not that it matters but that's a "V" right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
And there he is.

Your answer was what I called it. If you think that calls you "mealy mouthed" well, then you are in your own mind. Perhaps I should factor in your precious sensibilities and just called it a "dodge". Would that then make you a Dodger?

Feeling better now, snookums?

Your implication was clear, look - I'm not whining about the ad hom. You do you, just stop don't try to duck what you've done.
 
😂😂😂

1. I’m not on the left.
2. The multi-level hypocrisy of this post is epic. 10/10. Will read again.
Yes you are.
You may not like it but you are.
I’m a moderate life long Democrat. The things I have always believed line up more now with Republicans than Democrats. I don’t like that but that’s where we are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01
Can you elaborate? Given my reply to the poster, within context - I have no idea what point you're attempting to make.
You know exactly what my point is but choose to play that act. The inability for our current society to call out ALL sides on their indiscretions is a huge issue, a (spade a spade) if you will. When people say ONLY white people can be racist while reading racist garbage online from groups other than white people is both ingenuous and willfully ignorant. To constantly place blame on one specific group while having to dig up dirt in the bowels of the dark web in contrast to the same garbage being spewed on other front facing social media platforms and National news is ridiculous and lazy.

Your comment wasn't in context to what he was talking about like you think it was.
 
There you go resorting to insults. Classic example of losing your argument.

If after having been shown why your commiting a logical fallacy, you double and triple down - then it ceases to become a ignorance issue and becomes an intelligence problem.

You attacked a straw man by suggesting cars and insta pots are the same as high capacity rifles.
 
Your implication was clear, look - I'm not whining about the ad hom. You do you, just stop don't try to duck what you've done.

Sure sounds like whining to me. Otherwise why even mention it? "You did it first", there's the 6 year old again. You calling me a duck (LOL)?

Why would I duck anything? What are the repercussions? You going to take me to the woodshed on the internet?

Haha, you wish.

You're the one "dodging" the question, not me.
 
If after having been shown why your commiting a logical fallacy, you double and triple down - then it ceases to become a ignorance issue and becomes an intelligence problem.

You attacked a straw man by suggesting cars and insta pots are the same as high capacity rifles.
You are so freaking narrow minded you can't even make clear point. It doesn't agree with your stance so it's automatically strawman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Did that hit a little too close to home?

Just kidding bud.

No I’m 51 and probably use the Internet more than most . I was laughing at the BS resistance . Sometimes it does take some digging to find the facts . I use google a lot , even though I haven’t said on here , I have noticed it’s harder to find certain things when you look for them unless you are very specific in how you pose the question . I feel like sometimes you have to kind of paint the search results in a corner to get what you are looking for . Just something I’ve noticed .
 
That's the issue though. The Town square is a public place. An internet site is a privately owned entity equivalent to a business on the square.

I understand lol. I'm just saying that there is a discussion on if it will be defined as such.

But doing it in the town square puts a name and face behind the crazy and the hatred. Doing it as anonymous online is much different

The name and face point is inconsequential as free speech can be protected behind a mask.
 
@golfballs

You were asking for it a few days ago. Here's a better, more interactive list of every 2019 mass shooting, with links to details on each shooting and interactive maps. It also has a link to everything the GOP has done to limit these. Just kidding. Why link to a blank webpage. MAGA!

Mass Shootings in 2019 | Gun Violence Archive
EBPlXcYUwAEhsXs.png
Here's a pic of some of those shooters. It was posted earluer, but none of you acknowledged it. How many white supremacist do you think are here? I mean, that's all your side cries anyway.
 
Sure sounds like whining to me. Otherwise why even mention it? "You did it first", there's the 6 year old again.

Why would I duck anything What are the repercussions? You going to take me to the woodshed on the internet?

Haha, you wish.

I already have - you just don't realize it.

Again, pointing out your whining about personal insults while you were simultaneously hurling them from the start was simply meant to demonstrate your hypocrisy. It worked.
 
You are so freaking narrow minded you can't even make clear point. It doesn't agree with your stance so it's automatically strawman.

I don't know how else to make my point to you more clear.

YOU COMMITTED A LOGICAL FALLACY.

You are mischaracterizing the debate about firearms to a more easily attacked and defeated argument over pressure cookers and taxi cabs.

I did not create this strawman, I'm simply pointing out that what you perceive to be a equally valid argument, isn't.
 
I already have - you just don't realize it.

Again, pointing out your whining about personal insults while you were simultaneously hurling them from the start was simply meant to demonstrate your hypocrisy. It worked.
You should stop now, you are only humiliating yourself and ruining your self image.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top