Having a top 10 class means nothing to me. Even Fulmer (check history) had top 10 classes very often, also top 5 classes very often, TOP class many times as well. This was before everybody learned to use the computer and twitter and myspace and etc... to get recruits. Sometimes it is best to get the under rated players that play as a TEAM. Having a top recruiting class doesn't mean you are going to win all of the time or even make it to a BCS. To me recruiting rankings are just a conversation piece. Doesn't mean we are going to win or lose.
Just laughing at the folks who laughed at us. Hows it feel to be looking up to us once again. Did you enjoy your short time that you had a chance to rub things in our face. I hope you did...
I agree. If you do not develop the player or have a good system to plug them in to, a 5* will do you no good.
The stars aren't a reflection of a players overall potential to my understanding. They are a reflection of how quickly a prospect should/will contribute. A 5* is expected to have the ability to contribute early, whereas a 3* (in the rankings opinions) needs some time to develope. Kids upsides and 1000 other variables tends to even things out after a year or two on campus. Of course I'm speaking in general terms and there are exceptions to most rules. My point a 3* may very well be as good/better than a 5* by years 2-4.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Having a top 10 class means nothing to me. Even Fulmer (check history) had top 10 classes very often, also top 5 classes very often, TOP class many times as well. This was before everybody learned to use the computer and twitter and myspace and etc... to get recruits. Sometimes it is best to get the under rated players that play as a TEAM. Having a top recruiting class doesn't mean you are going to win all of the time or even make it to a BCS. To me recruiting rankings are just a conversation piece. Doesn't mean we are going to win or lose.
Having a top 10 class means nothing to me. Even Fulmer (check history) had top 10 classes very often, also top 5 classes very often, TOP class many times as well. This was before everybody learned to use the computer and twitter and myspace and etc... to get recruits. Sometimes it is best to get the under rated players that play as a TEAM. Having a top recruiting class doesn't mean you are going to win all of the time or even make it to a BCS. To me recruiting rankings are just a conversation piece. Doesn't mean we are going to win or lose.
You know who else doesn't care about top 10 recruting classes?? NOBODY WHO COACHES DIVISION 1!
Besides ..... 7 of the top 10 will be shuffled in or out of it by the day after signing day anyways. It doesn't matter what's on paper before then.