lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 74,029
- Likes
- 43,758
You entirely positive about that?
Might want to make sure before you start making absolute claims.
I am delighted to see that most folks here think that the handgun open carry people need mental health treatment.
The NRA thought that, too. For awhile.
NRA at first blasted the group as an embarrassment. But now the NRA says they support them.
Two of those serve alcohol, don't all states prohibit open carry in such establishments?
Sonic, I don't get. No one eats inside a sonic.
Actually, I think you'd find most people that have replied in this thread don't see OC handguns as a big deal. OC long guns on the other hand is moronic, especially with what Open Carry Texas is trying to accomplish.
If we were to reference another political move, their continued "damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead" approach in carrying long guns everywhere they go would be the same as same sex marriage folks having butt sex in the middle of the street.
Well now waiting a minute.
If the point of open carry is to dissuade potential criminals, .
Well now waiting a minute.
If the point of open carry is to dissuade potential criminals, then either is fine and in fact the rifle is better because it's more easily seen.
If the point is to be a gunslinger like in the movies, then that's served better by the handgun.
The people who want to open carry handguns seem to me to be much more antagonist and ego - driven. I find it hard to come up with any other answer than that they think it looks really cool.
You're really a hoot, you know that?
So you are saying if you were sitting in a restaurant and someone came in carrying an AR15 you'd be perfectly okay with it?
The point behind OC isn't the fact it deters criminals, it's called a Right. You know, part of that "keep and bear arms" part of the Second Amendment. (reference the Heller decision since I know you haven't/won't)
I carry openly from time to time, do I strike you are being an antagonist and ego driven? And I'm way far from being cool in anyone's book.
The people who want to open carry handguns seem to me to be much more antagonist and ego - driven. I find it hard to come up with any other answer than that they think it looks really cool.
No, I said I'd roll my eyes at how idiotic someone with a rifle in Chipotle looks, and the irony that they think its cool.
Someone with a handgun in that scenario, in my view, has crossed over the line from childish, immature, and perhaps mildly retarded, to someone with great potential to be a menacing bully, someone itching for an excuse to be a tough guy.
Someone with a handgun in that scenario, in my view, has crossed over the line from childish, immature, and perhaps mildly retarded, to someone with great potential to be a menacing bully, someone itching for an excuse to be a tough guy.
I'd say I find people who walk their pit bulls that end up barking and growling at everyone are far more antagonistic and ego driven than someone who open carries a pistol. I mean the chances of that pistol jumping out of a holster and firing a few rounds is pretty...well, it doesn't happen.
But the chances of that pit bull attacking if I get too close?
No, I said I'd roll my eyes at how idiotic someone with a rifle in Chipotle looks, and the irony that they think its cool.
Someone with a handgun in that scenario, in my view, has crossed over the line from childish, immature, and perhaps mildly retarded, to someone with great potential to be a menacing bully, someone itching for an excuse to be a tough guy.
Well now waiting a minute.
If the point of open carry is to dissuade potential criminals, then either is fine and in fact the rifle is better because it's more easily seen.
If the point is to be a gunslinger like in the movies, then that's served better by the handgun.
The people who want to open carry handguns seem to me to be much more antagonist and ego - driven. I find it hard to come up with any other answer than that they think it looks really cool.
I'd say I find people who walk their pit bulls that end up barking and growling at everyone are far more antagonistic and ego driven than someone who open carries a pistol. I mean the chances of that pistol jumping out of a holster and firing a few rounds is pretty...well, it doesn't happen.
But the chances of that pit bull attacking if I get too close?
Actually, I tend to wonder about people that walk around with pit bulls, but whatever, the analogy is terrible because the concern with open carry is that, in the right (read wrong) circumstances, it is going to either cause an escalation in a situation, or cause someone who loses their cool to resort to gun violence in a moment of rage.
One does not have to go very far back in the local paper to find many instances of that scenario, even when it doesn't involve a gun as readily accessible as one carried on the hip.
I just get the sincere impression that the people who want to wear handguns are the same people I steered away from in junior high who were obsessed with nunchucks, karate lessons, and throwing stars.
In my view, someone who rolls their eyes in Chipotles looks idiotic. And the person who attributes bully motives onto the person that probably hasn't even noticed them has elementary school issues they need to work out.
I just get the sincere impression that the people who want to wear handguns are the same people I steered away from in junior high who were obsessed with nunchucks, karate lessons, and throwing stars.