Recruiting Forum Football Talk IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s not a question that they would be in violation of antitrust laws if they put out restrictions on NIL, they 100% would be in violation of antitrust laws and would lose in court…they have absolutely no power now and they know it. Also it literally says this in the constitution,
Freedom of Enterprise and Choice

Private entrepreneurs are free to obtain and organize resources for the production of goods and services, and to sell goods and services in markets of their choice. Consumers are at liberty to buy the goods and services that best satisfy their economic wants. “

Uh...what are you talking about? That is not literally in the Constitution of the United States. Nowhere in the text are those words written. "Freedom of Enterprise and Choice" is not an enumerated right anywhere in the text.

And no, it is not 100% a violation of antitrust laws. Would it be likely? Maybe. The NCAA would probably have to come up with a better justification to defend those rules than in cases like NCAA v Board of Regents. So far in its legislative history, the NCAA has successfully used "health and safety" and "defending amateurism" as defenses to antitrust challenges. The biggest issue for the NCAA is the changing of a belief in "amateurism" as a rational goal to offset the obvious restriction in the market. It seems like we know how Kavanaugh would rule, but we have no clue how the other 8 would decide.
 
Well he is a canoe for doing that, but a message board running joke about Mullen's wife making out with football players when she literally kisses them before every game is not the same as putting out on a platform like Twitter with an enormous reach that a player tested positive for PEDs with zero evidence to back up that claim.
It's really sad that you have to explain the obvious difference in these two things..🤦‍♂️
 
It's really sad that you have to explain the obvious difference in these two things..🤦‍♂️
IdenticalNextEskimodog-size_restricted.gif
 
Uh...what are you talking about? That is not literally in the Constitution of the United States. Nowhere in the text are those words written. "Freedom of Enterprise and Choice" is not an enumerated right anywhere in the text.

And no, it is not 100% a violation of antitrust laws. Would it be likely? Maybe. The NCAA would probably have to come up with a better justification to defend those rules than in cases like NCAA v Board of Regents. So far in its legislative history, the NCAA has successfully used "health and safety" and "defending amateurism" as defenses to antitrust challenges. The biggest issue for the NCAA is the changing of a belief in "amateurism" as a rational goal to offset the obvious restriction in the market. It seems like we know how Kavanaugh would rule, but we have no clue how the other 8 would decide.
Anyone have an actualt update on Carnell ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top