This is my preference.Let's start Shrout and see how it goes. Shrout has not been getting first team reps in the past. He possibly gets that opportunity now. Next man up. JG has three seasons of first team reps/games and still looks the same. Want to see BM back up if he gets cleared.
Wish we could cut the narrative in here. JG went rogue. Stupidity, selfishness, whatever - it really doesn't matter. He should sit the rest of the season or move on.
You know what JG is. South Carolina knows what JG is. We’ve seen this play out over the course of several games. At least there’s an unknown element with JTS. You’re not fooling anybody with JG back there and muschamp laid the blue print last year on how to defend JG.
Do the neurologists say in the article that (1) they do not know that it is the case that he had two concussions in back to back games and (2) they are not willing to offer a remote diagnosis and (3) that they are answering a hypothetical question?
I want to know whether in the black type on the page (so to speak) Ubblah explicitly quotes or paraphrases them as saying these three things. NOT leaving it to the reader to assume something absolutely decisive that he (Ubblahboo) omitted.Yes, basically. It's all theoretical, but it's clear that they are implying that if he indeed had 2 concussions, he shouldn't clear protocol in time for Saturday.
I got it here. http://www.raising-chickens.org/kill-a-chicken.html#targetText=To%20kill%20a%20chicken%20by,chicken%20is%20not%20still%20alive.
You ever watch at Cooter Brown's?
Well, if he actually says "Unlike bama with Juedy"Pruitt needs to come out an say Maurer did not have any concussions. He doesn't have to specify the injury but he does, imo, need to clear the air about Maurer being concussed and say he was taken out do to precautions. Unlike bama with Juedy. This is if he plays Saturday of course.