MSCE09
09 Tennessee Alum
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2010
- Messages
- 4,442
- Likes
- 1,564
The pistol would not improve things at all. It takes too long for the RB to get to the line of scrimmage as it is - much less adding another couple of yards. If the RB was moved up to 5 yards back of it he would have a much better chance to gain some yards.
Now that this thread has been railroaded, I dunno about a serious response but here it goes.
Has anybody heard of teams running the pistol successfuly without a QB who is a threat to take off? It's like a shotgun formation that allows for better downhill running if you've got a line that can run block (which we can't) but I don't see how it would work for the players we've got.
I personally like the formation, but still, blockers have to block, and runners have to run for this, or any formation to be successful. If Poole, or whoever dances around too long, or are immediatly met by a big d-lineman, it really doesnt matter what formation they are in.
