I do not see a way that Currie gets out of this with his job. I really feel like this backdoor deal with Schiano has woken the sleeping giants up. Lets look at some facts/opinions:
1. For ANY coach on the Gruden/Saban level, control was going to have to be given to the coach. Its the way it needs/has to be. Period.
2. Haslam does not want to let this happen. Facts surrounding the 2012 debacle prove this. If Jimmy Hyams will admit it, you know there is merit to it.
3. I firmly believe the major boosters not named Haslam were formulating/formulated a deal with Gruden. What all was offered l, I do not know, nor do I care. All I care is that enough people that can make a difference does care. I believe their intentions were to hand Currie a deal all but signed for him to look like a hero with. In return, he gets the glory for a coach at the top of the list and the funding to renovate Neyland. Davenport got the funding for the academic side. Everyone walks away winners. These people are not dummies, they were close in 2012.
4. Currie was instructed to play along, making a Schiano hire easy. This is largely the same way we ended up with Lyle in 2012.
5. Yesterday, the AD and Haslam got notice that their game would not work so easy this time around.
6. As well funded as Haslam is, I do not think that he is able nor willing to pay for the renovations to Neyland all by himself. If donors start backing out of that deal, it forces the universitys hand. They might have the Trump card here. I hope. A lot.
7. Haslam has a huge man crush on Schiano. He wanted him in Cleveland, but that didnt happen. He had a place to put Schiano as long as he said he would be a yes man. It is also convenient that Jimmy Sexton represents him. I know he represents a lot of people, but he is all too welcome here.
I hate to be this guy, but I would like for the University, not Currie, make a serious offer to Gruden. Make him say no publicly at this point. If we make a fully backed run at him, we might like what happens.
I agree Exile. You can't just point to one thing as the reason. The most glaring thing for me is what former Bucs players stated. That he propagated an "atmosphere of fear" in the locker room. We certainly didn't/don't need another KJJ.There were multiple reasons the Schiano was objectionable. But I think it is wrong to suggest that his questionable history in relation to child abuse didn't play a primary role in yesterday's events.
How did this just get swept under the rug like it never happened! None of this ish makes sense at all.
CBS Sports: Jon Gruden in discussions with Tennessee about head coaching job
Oh I am not saying it didn't play into yesterday's events. What I am saying is that yesterday's events are being viewed in some heroic light that we/someone saved the day from Tennessee hiring a "morally deficient man" when in fact we just tried to get a better football coach. I bet the info regarding Penn State didn't start the fire but only added fuel later. The we turn it into a narrative about how morally upright we are. That's the problem. If it were a "homerun-hire-coach" with Penn State ties we wouldn't have said a word.
This may have already been stated in some way or another, but here goes anyway.
He said never say never, he talked about loving Rocky Top but he never denied or said no publicly.
It looks as if Currie never asked him? He was only interested in Schiano.
Maybe there was nothing to deny? Maybe saying "never say never" was an invitation to ask? Maybe talking about Rocky Top was him saying look at me, I am interested. I know it may be really far fetched, but the fact he nor his agent never said no was because he didn't have anything to say no to?
He has he ego and the balls to say yes and not blink to what is going on with the program. I say bring him on.
Oh I am not saying it didn't play into yesterday's events. What I am saying is that yesterday's events are being viewed in some heroic light that we/someone saved the day from Tennessee hiring a "morally deficient man" when in fact we just tried to get a better football coach. I bet the info regarding Penn State didn't start the fire but only added fuel later. The we turn it into a narrative about how morally upright we are. That's the problem. If it were a "homerun-hire-coach" with Penn State ties we wouldn't have said a word.
How did this just get swept under the rug like it never happened! None of this ish makes sense at all.
CBS Sports: Jon Gruden in discussions with Tennessee about head coaching job
Can't stomach the jerk. We would really look desperate if we took him back after what he did. Having said that, the ONLY way I would consider it is with NO buyout from UT but Kiffen would have to pay a huge buyout if he left.
Yeah, can't take the foot off the gas now, that's what they're hoping.
Sunday = rage
Monday = pissed
Tuesday = seething
Wednesday = simmering
Thursday = what's for breakfast
They only have to wait a few more days to bend us over and **** us dry
Oh I am not saying it didn't play into yesterday's events. What I am saying is that yesterday's events are being viewed in some heroic light that we/someone saved the day from Tennessee hiring a "morally deficient man" when in fact we just tried to get a better football coach. I bet the info regarding Penn State didn't start the fire but only added fuel later. The we turn it into a narrative about how morally upright we are. That's the problem. If it were a "homerun-hire-coach" with Penn State ties we wouldn't have said a word.