Noah's Ark Encounter Opens In Kentucky

#102
#102
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#109
#109
dduncan4163 said:
Care to elaborate?
Click to expand...

I swear i am not getting into this dd but he is referring to the fact that the alternative to believeing in Creation for most is believing that every living thing evolved purely by chance, the odds of which are beyond astronomical. And before someone points out that given enough time, the probability of anything becomes 1, no...in this case the beginning of it all, inanimate promordial soup of amino acids becoming any living thing has a probability of zero. Zero...becauae it has never happened. Ever. There is absolutely no scientific evidence that it ever happened...even in rigged lab expwriments where it is given every imaginable (and astronomically infinitesimally unlikely to occur naturally) advantage, and the amino acids etc. Are there under perfect conditions, every thinkable catalyst was added like electricity, radiation, intense light, etc....and they still couldnt make it happen. Still had a dish full of dead goop...tje exact same dead amino acids they arrangwd in the dish. So while it is easy to poke supposed holes and poke fun at Christianity, while muslims murder people daily worldwide as we feed and clothe them, non believers also have a HUGE logical problem to reconcile. Without God, life doesnt exist. Period. There is absolutely nothing a man can do to make life exist from inanimate materials when that happening is given every possible advamtage and stimuli. So its really hard to believe that if a man cant do it intentionally in a lab with unlimited resources and all the benwfits of Science Almighty, that it happened accidentally all by itself on a mostly barren planet millions or billions of years ago. Amd that is just the tip of the iceberg. Thatbis merely the absurdity of creation of life without a creator. That doesnt begim to touch the huge holes in evolution other than micro and variation in species. There are many absurdities in that theory from beginning to end, and the honest scientist acknowledges that, while the typical attacker of creation here instead immediately states ornimplies that because they believe in evolution omstead of creation that they hold some intellectual higj ground, and that only a moron could believe in creation. This horse is glue in this forum. Last post from me about it. Yall enjoy whats left of the weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#110
#110
marcusluvsvols said:
I swear i am not getting into this dd but he is referring to the fact that the alternative to believeing in Creation for most is believing that every living thing evolved purely by chance, the odds of which are beyond astronomical. And before someone points out that given enough time, the probability of anything becomes 1, no...in this case the beginning of it all, inanimate promordial soup of amino acids becoming any living thing has a probability of zero. Zero...becauae it has never happened. Ever. There is absolutely no scientific evidence that it ever happened...even in rigged lab expwriments where it is given every imaginable (and astronomically infinitesimally unlikely to occur naturally) advantage, and the amino acids etc. Are there under perfect conditions, every thinkable catalyst was added like electricity, radiation, intense light, etc....and they still couldnt make it happen. Still had a dish full of dead goop...tje exact same dead amino acids they arrangwd in the dish. So while it is easy to poke supposed holes and poke fun at Christianity, while muslims murder people daily worldwide as we feed and clothe them, non believers also have a HUGE logical problem to reconcile. Without God, life doesnt exist. Period. There is absolutely nothing a man can do to make life exist from inanimate materials when that happening is given every possible advamtage and stimuli. So its really hard to believe that if a man cant do it intentionally in a lab with unlimited resources and all the benwfits of Science Almighty, that it happened accidentally all by itself on a mostly barren planet millions or billions of years ago. Amd that is just the tip of the iceberg. Thatbis merely the absurdity of creation of life without a creator. That doesnt begim to touch the huge holes in evolution other than micro and variation in species. There are many absurdities in that theory from beginning to end, and the honest scientist acknowledges that, while the typical attacker of creation here instead immediately states ornimplies that because they believe in evolution omstead of creation that they hold some intellectual higj ground, and that only a moron could believe in creation. This horse is glue in this forum. Last post from me about it. Yall enjoy whats left of the weekend.
Click to expand...

God would use paragraphs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
#111
#111
marcusluvsvols said:
I swear i am not getting into this dd but he is referring to the fact that the alternative to believeing in Creation for most is believing that every living thing evolved purely by chance, the odds of which are beyond astronomical. And before someone points out that given enough time, the probability of anything becomes 1, no...in this case the beginning of it all, inanimate promordial soup of amino acids becoming any living thing has a probability of zero. Zero...becauae it has never happened. Ever. There is absolutely no scientific evidence that it ever happened...even in rigged lab expwriments where it is given every imaginable (and astronomically infinitesimally unlikely to occur naturally) advantage, and the amino acids etc. Are there under perfect conditions, every thinkable catalyst was added like electricity, radiation, intense light, etc....and they still couldnt make it happen. Still had a dish full of dead goop...tje exact same dead amino acids they arrangwd in the dish. So while it is easy to poke supposed holes and poke fun at Christianity, while muslims murder people daily worldwide as we feed and clothe them, non believers also have a HUGE logical problem to reconcile. Without God, life doesnt exist. Period. There is absolutely nothing a man can do to make life exist from inanimate materials when that happening is given every possible advamtage and stimuli. So its really hard to believe that if a man cant do it intentionally in a lab with unlimited resources and all the benwfits of Science Almighty, that it happened accidentally all by itself on a mostly barren planet millions or billions of years ago. Amd that is just the tip of the iceberg. Thatbis merely the absurdity of creation of life without a creator. That doesnt begim to touch the huge holes in evolution other than micro and variation in species. There are many absurdities in that theory from beginning to end, and the honest scientist acknowledges that, while the typical attacker of creation here instead immediately states ornimplies that because they believe in evolution omstead of creation that they hold some intellectual higj ground, and that only a moron could believe in creation. This horse is glue in this forum. Last post from me about it. Yall enjoy whats left of the weekend.
Click to expand...

There is so much wrong here its not worth going into.

It's an unwinnable case anyway. If man were to create life out of goop in a lab, you would point out that it proves it does indeed take intelligence for life to exist. If man can't do it, then it still means that intelligence is needed, we just aren't has intelligent as that "higher power". You will see what you want to see.

I ask this before, and I usually get crickets....what would constitute evidence or proof, that God isn't required? What would convince you God is not needed for life to be seeded? Specifically. I suspect your answer to this will say a lot.

But it still doesn't mean that because man can't do it in "rigged lab experiments" that it must be "God". Any honest scientist will also tell you this isn't an A or B question. There could be options C, D, E, F, G that we may not know about yet. Simply pointing out issues with A and claiming B the answer is not the way this works. It's not the way any of this works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#114
#114
rjd970 said:
There is so much wrong here its not worth going into.

It's an unwinnable case anyway. If man were to create life out of goop in a lab, you would point out that it proves it does indeed take intelligence for life to exist. If man can't do it, then it still means that intelligence is needed, we just aren't has intelligent as that "higher power". You will see what you want to see.

I ask this before, and I usually get crickets....what would constitute evidence or proof, that God isn't required? What would convince you God is not needed for life to be seeded? Specifically. I suspect your answer to this will say a lot.

But it still doesn't mean that because man can't do it in "rigged lab experiments" that it must be "God". Any honest scientist will also tell you this isn't an A or B question. There could be options C, D, E, F, G that we may not know about yet. Simply pointing out issues with A and claiming B the answer is not the way this works. It's not the way any of this works.
Click to expand...

To paraphrase..."if you can't explain it 100%..then God" it's the old argument of the watchmaker analogy...but just because we don't have the capacity to answer it..yet...then it has to be intelligent design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#119
#119
In a world where epi pens transform into The Epic Penis, autocorrect has made me hesitant to critisize posts made from a 'smart' phone
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#120
#120
For all the people in thread who constantly demand political or social tolerance, it's a same it isn't a two way street with Christianty. There's discussions and disagreements, and then there are those who have only posted to mock and belittle.

I'm not wasting my time giving my input, but I can't keep scrolling without saying a lot of the insults in this thread are ridiculous, and I see most threads in the this sub-forum over a lot of different subjects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#123
#123
Obsessed said:
15 Famous Thinkers Who Couldn't Spell - Online College Courses

I'd be careful with your statement.
Click to expand...

I am typing at about 5o words a min ona 4 inch screen and absolutely do not care about typos...lol. heres some real food for ridicule:

I won the school spelling bee every year eligible.
.thats right...6,7 and 8 grade. Went to county and lost...my son wom it every year too..he made it to christian school regionals...we are nerds and actually study from the scripps howard book while in the car on the way to soccer, church etc


I would absolutely embarrass you ina spelling contest, Hill. Youbwould likely miss dozens of words before i ever did...so would my kids :)...now point out how i am a stuck up genius that i never claimed to be while i laugh at you aloud...

Pro tip: since you have so mch time to study my posts...find a single post i have made that has a spelling error where the correct key isnt right next to the one i hurriedly struck with my fat thumbs...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#125
#125
marcusluvsvols said:
I swear i am not getting into this dd but he is referring to the fact that the alternative to believeing in Creation for most is believing that every living thing evolved purely by chance, the odds of which are beyond astronomical. And before someone points out that given enough time, the probability of anything becomes 1, no...in this case the beginning of it all, inanimate promordial soup of amino acids becoming any living thing has a probability of zero. Zero...becauae it has never happened. Ever. There is absolutely no scientific evidence that it ever happened...even in rigged lab expwriments where it is given every imaginable (and astronomically infinitesimally unlikely to occur naturally) advantage, and the amino acids etc. Are there under perfect conditions, every thinkable catalyst was added like electricity, radiation, intense light, etc....and they still couldnt make it happen. Still had a dish full of dead goop...tje exact same dead amino acids they arrangwd in the dish. So while it is easy to poke supposed holes and poke fun at Christianity, while muslims murder people daily worldwide as we feed and clothe them, non believers also have a HUGE logical problem to reconcile. Without God, life doesnt exist. Period. There is absolutely nothing a man can do to make life exist from inanimate materials when that happening is given every possible advamtage and stimuli. So its really hard to believe that if a man cant do it intentionally in a lab with unlimited resources and all the benwfits of Science Almighty, that it happened accidentally all by itself on a mostly barren planet millions or billions of years ago. Amd that is just the tip of the iceberg. Thatbis merely the absurdity of creation of life without a creator. That doesnt begim to touch the huge holes in evolution other than micro and variation in species. There are many absurdities in that theory from beginning to end, and the honest scientist acknowledges that, while the typical attacker of creation here instead immediately states ornimplies that because they believe in evolution omstead of creation that they hold some intellectual higj ground, and that only a moron could believe in creation. This horse is glue in this forum. Last post from me about it. Yall enjoy whats left of the weekend.
Click to expand...

Again, the guy who CONSTANTLY states he's not going to "get into it", continues to get into it.

And I'll say this for about the 100th time, your knowledge of evolution is laughable, and you continue to make bold assertions but then get pissed when you're called on said bold assertions and act like you're getting attacked.

You say "honest scientists acknowledge it"....do you like pointing out how utterly ignorant you are about science. Of course they acknowledge things they aren't sure of, unlike you, they actually question the things they discover. They most certainly acknowledge the "holes" as you call it, but you know what, they actually know what said holes are and know that none in any way dismiss the entire theory. You on the other hand throw out "it has holes so it's crap" and then proceed to assert with 100% certainty something you in no way can prove at all.

If you have a genius level IQ, then I can slam dunk with my feet.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top