SCOTUS did not ok pay for play (offering recruits money to play at X school). They gave the ok to NIL to student athletes already on campus. This isn’t a new rule and even when the new NIL rule was made, it clearly stated it was for players on campus and could not be used in recruiting. @LWSVOL is correct.
Reading through some of the wording on this, it is the schools (Presidents) driving this bus, not the NCAA. Presidents don’t want paying recruits to come to school and want to curve the tampering of offering NIL to transfer players. Will it work? Mark me down as a skeptic.
Think of this as the Texas A&M rule.
ATM rule for recruiting and USC rule for tampering, that’s your showponys.
True, because they are losing control of some of the billions they make from college kids, and they don’t like it.
They are fine with their million dollar salary and the coaches making millions.
They also don’t like the idea of all teams possibly benefiting, they like to keep their money makers at the top every year and all this NIL money and transfer portal might upset the balance.