But this isn't a trial, it's supposedly a job interview and two other women besides Ms. Ford came forward. That's all I'm saying.
It's the constitutional protocol for confirming a SC justice. Which part of that protocol dictates stopping the process based on unproven and unprovable accusations? And further, as mentioned, since you brought "love" into it, which definition for love includes guilty until proven innocent, ruining someone's life, career, reputation...? Dragging their wife and kids through the mud...?
And "that's" not all you were saying. You blatantly and objectively called him a liar, and said that he perjured himself. What part of "love" is that? Now, clearly, you've backed off of that a bit and distanced yourself from the statement/accusation. But that's what you said.
In saying that you don't like sexual assault, you were clearly insinuating he is one. Is that kind of unfounded accusation in your definition of "loving"?
Very, very unloving, I would say. (Depending on your definition, I guess. But if all that is included in your definition of "love", you've diluted it to having become incomprehensible.)