Kavanaugh Confirmation

Took anyone to trial for perjury based on their usage of those two terms, 38 years ago, as opposed to your supposed definitions.

You and I both know you'd never take the case, and would be laughed out of court if you did.
But this isn't a trial, it's supposedly a job interview and two other women besides Ms. Ford came forward. That's all I'm saying.
 
But this isn't a trial, it's supposedly a job interview and two other women besides Ms. Ford came forward. That's all I'm saying.

Yes, and you'll probably have 10 more by next week if they continued this. So.

Nobody has to vote yes.
 
But this isn't a trial, it's supposedly a job interview and two other women besides Ms. Ford came forward. That's all I'm saying.

If it is just a job interview then the Committee has the hiring decision and the majority of the Committee has said they've heard enough and feel K is the person for the job.
 
Anal and a threesome. allegedly. however terms today aren't the terms of then. Slang isnt agreeable in all corners of the country and are locally determined. its not for us to translate it.

If "boof" means fart, the sentence in the yearbook would mean "have you farted yet." With any intellectual honesty, do any of you want to maintain that judge and Kavanaugh were asking each other whether they had farted yet? Seems much more likely they were using one of the accepted meaning (anal sex or consuming alcohol anally).
 
  • Like
Reactions: JCP201
If "boof" means fart, the sentence in the yearbook would mean "have you farted yet." With any intellectual honesty, do any of you want to maintain that judge and Kavanaugh were asking each other whether they had farted yet? Seems much more likely they were using one of the accepted meaning (anal sex or consuming alcohol anally).
because most people make anal sex references in their high school year books in 1982
 
If "boof" means fart, the sentence in the yearbook would mean "have you farted yet." With any intellectual honesty, do any of you want to maintain that judge and Kavanaugh were asking each other whether they had farted yet? Seems much more likely they were using one of the accepted meaning (anal sex or consuming alcohol anally).
Wait...butt chugging is a possible definition?
Did he attend any UT frat parties?
 
Yeah, I think that's about the only right answer. If the motive was only to dispel a myth of childhood drinking, I'd say it was no big deal. But in the bigger picture, It's a bigger deal, in my opinion.
That is the only right answer. Now, we all know this was just a delay tactic to try to get one over on Trump, play turnabout on the Rs, and try to keep a perceived conservative vote off the bench.

But the protocol isn't to make a big fuss of unproven accusations at the last second and stop the confirmation. It's to take the time to prove the case and then have him impeached based on proof and evidence.

The problem, as I suspect it, is that the Ds know they'll never be able to prove this or make a case, so they know they'll never get an impeachment. They just have a lack of evidence, and screeching, in an effort to stop the process.
 
If "boof" means fart, the sentence in the yearbook would mean "have you farted yet." With any intellectual honesty, do any of you want to maintain that judge and Kavanaugh were asking each other whether they had farted yet? Seems much more likely they were using one of the accepted meaning (anal sex or consuming alcohol anally).

Maybe one of their post secondary education opportunities were at UTK and they had hopes of joining a particular frat?

EDIT: Dang. McDad is quick on the trigger today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
If "boof" means fart, the sentence in the yearbook would mean "have you farted yet." With any intellectual honesty, do any of you want to maintain that judge and Kavanaugh were asking each other whether they had farted yet? Seems much more likely they were using one of the accepted meaning (anal sex or consuming alcohol anally).

He lied... I've decided it to be most probable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JCP201
If "boof" means fart, the sentence in the yearbook would mean "have you farted yet." With any intellectual honesty, do any of you want to maintain that judge and Kavanaugh were asking each other whether they had farted yet? Seems much more likely they were using one of the accepted meaning (anal sex or consuming alcohol anally).
Ah... The old "much more likely" protocol for stopping a SC confirmation. Which Amendment is that one in?
 
We should subpoena his high school diary and look for references to anal sex
Dear diary,
Today my girlfriend and i drove down the Hershey highway. I threw a rod getting out of a mudhole. We were dirty...very dirty, diary. Butt, luckily the back door was open just a crack and we cleaned up before anybody knew.
 
But this isn't a trial, it's supposedly a job interview and two other women besides Ms. Ford came forward. That's all I'm saying.
It's the constitutional protocol for confirming a SC justice. Which part of that protocol dictates stopping the process based on unproven and unprovable accusations? And further, as mentioned, since you brought "love" into it, which definition for love includes guilty until proven innocent, ruining someone's life, career, reputation...? Dragging their wife and kids through the mud...?

And "that's" not all you were saying. You blatantly and objectively called him a liar, and said that he perjured himself. What part of "love" is that? Now, clearly, you've backed off of that a bit and distanced yourself from the statement/accusation. But that's what you said.

In saying that you don't like sexual assault, you were clearly insinuating he is one. Is that kind of unfounded accusation in your definition of "loving"?

Very, very unloving, I would say. (Depending on your definition, I guess. But if all that is included in your definition of "love", you've diluted it to having become incomprehensible.)
 
Impeachment, if he's lied. Is that in the Constitution or and Ammendment? I dunno.
As I've said repeatedly, that's the protocol. Not crying until you stop the confirmation.

Why do you think they're not relying on the "impeachment" protocol? I have my suspicions. Should I share? Or do you want to share your suspicions first?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top