Kavanaugh Confirmation

Vol445..did your fart reference at a party you may or may not have been to in a year that you may or may not know mean you are a serial rapist?

I was told via a friend of a friend that the fart reference may be a comment regarding anal rape. We clearly are not talking about just a fart. This is about anal rape, I believe, I think I heard someone even say that when I was drunk.
 
See I knew you weren’t a commie ... just a socialist . 😊 I’m guessing somewhere between Bernie Bro and Cortez crazy eyes .
People like Zeppelin should be tarred and feathered for their anti-american beliefs against this country. They are the reason why we need so much welfare benefits
 
  • Like
Reactions: SLICKYINC
So let me get this straight, defending your name to baseless accusations is now the equivalent of having a tantrum.

Obviously I'm in the minority in believing it would help the guy. And no, I don't think him lashing out at the suggestion of an FBI investigation is a good move.
 
I get flack for pointing out the obvious,. that an FBI investigation would help the man be all squeaky clean. He says his life has been destroyed by accusations. How would he possibly recover from such a thing. Maybe by having a tantrum at a Senate hearing will do it.

And the fact we didn't need one in July is not that obvious.
 
There is no crime scene, there are no witnesses... Congress had her before them today, she is the only witness... they could reasonably ask her anything they wanted. The FBI doesn't have jurisdiction to run a criminal probe. The only thing the FBI can possibly do is take statements, but is only if you have cooperating witness. Get it?
I understand and I agree, but you can still have the FBI "investigate" which would include interviews with her and interviews with the ones who said they weren't there. There is a bit the FBI can investigate without a crime scene and no known witnesses at this point. ****, on my background check, an FBI agent interviewed a person I went to school with 20 years ago that I didn't have listed on my SF86
 
Obviously I'm in the minority in believing it would help the guy. And no, I don't think him lashing out at the suggestion of an FBI investigation is a good move.

You clearly don't understand basic jurisdiction law or common sense investigation work. The people at the "party" gave statements that it didn't occur, there is no crime scene, even if there was a crime scene the FBI doesn't have jurisdiction. All the FBI can do is take statements from cooperating witnesses, in this case there is only one alleged witness and she was before the committee today... no need for the FBI.

Exactly what is the FBI going to investigate, its a stupid discussion.
 
I wish K had simply said, "It's not my place to direct the committee in what investigations need to take place." In reference to another FBI investigation.
 
You've been reasonable throughout this whole process until the last couple of days. Somehow, you've taken on the idiocy of the Democratic Senators on this panel.

Sad, really, you were the opposition I could respect. But you've lost whatever credibility you had with me through this process.

I know you'll love sleep over it, too.

Well Hells Bells. Ill apologize for lowering your expectations. You can dismiss my beliefs if you like, I don't believe I'm the hack you suspect, but I have thick enough skin to carry on.
 
Obviously I'm in the minority in believing it would help the guy. And no, I don't think him lashing out at the suggestion of an FBI investigation is a good move.
What exactly would it do? Thats the point.... Its been explained and explained. They would not reach a conclusion, thats the job of the committee. The victim, I repeat, the victim showed up with 2, not 1, attorney but 2 to answer her allegations. Think about it. Do you believe for 1 f’ing second she would answer something off script. And... say K showed up with an attorney today, the guy accused, you dolts would lose your shi.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Which part of "not the FBI's domain" has escaped you these past two weeks?

It's a big Sh|Tshow, I know. Trump could have said, let's do the transparency thing and at the least it would have shut down the whole narrative. Maybe it wouldn't have been politically prudent or something. I don't know.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top