tim
Volsquatch
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Messages
- 18,999
- Likes
- 5,712
The fact you have drawn this conclusion from the presented facts/testimony is scary. I hope you aren't a real lawyer. If you are I hope you aren't involved in peoples lives. Like..I hope you practice Tree Law.I think it's quite possible that he assaulted Ford and simply doesn't remember it because he was too drunk. That seems to be the best way to reconcile the testimony. He's a little too strident, and the suggestions of left-wing hit jobs is not becoming for someone interviewing for a SCOTUS appointment, but his denials are believeable.
lol.I think it's quite possible that he assaulted Ford and simply doesn't remember it because he was too drunk. That seems to be the best way to reconcile the testimony. He's a little too strident, and the suggestions of left-wing hit jobs is not becoming for someone interviewing for a SCOTUS appointment, but his denials are believeable.
I think it's quite possible that he assaulted Ford and simply doesn't remember it because he was too drunk. That seems to be the best way to reconcile the testimony. He's a little too strident, and the suggestions of left-wing hit jobs is not becoming for someone interviewing for a SCOTUS appointment, but his denials are believeable.
That’s your problem. Just don’t “think”.I think it's quite possible that he assaulted Ford and simply doesn't remember it because he was too drunk. That seems to be the best way to reconcile the testimony. He's a little too strident, and the suggestions of left-wing hit jobs is not becoming for someone interviewing for a SCOTUS appointment, but his denials are believeable.
Just as possible that she was too drunk and though he was there while he was never there at all. Wonder if the other people, including her friend who didn't corroborate her story of the event, were too drunk as well.I think it's quite possible that he assaulted Ford and simply doesn't remember it because he was too drunk. That seems to be the best way to reconcile the testimony. He's a little too strident, and the suggestions of left-wing hit jobs is not becoming for someone interviewing for a SCOTUS appointment, but his denials are believeable.
he mentioned that in one section and hasnt since.I think it's quite possible that he assaulted Ford and simply doesn't remember it because he was too drunk. That seems to be the best way to reconcile the testimony. He's a little too strident, and the suggestions of left-wing hit jobs is not becoming for someone interviewing for a SCOTUS appointment, but his denials are believeable.
its also quiet possible the woman who can't remember anything latched on to a name when she honestly can't recall. she has an obviousl political lean and is profiting greatly off of this.I think it's quite possible that he assaulted Ford and simply doesn't remember it because he was too drunk. That seems to be the best way to reconcile the testimony. He's a little too strident, and the suggestions of left-wing hit jobs is not becoming for someone interviewing for a SCOTUS appointment, but his denials are believeable.
Truth is truth. High school kids from that generation, and i was one, had this stuff happen all the time. If i had a nickel for every lude comment, grope, whatever I've seen or heard about, I'd be rich.
Different personalities receive things different. I had a friend Mary, who would squat and pee in the woods at a party, right in sight of anyone. Other girls would never dream of that. I remember one time me and several other friends were at a party and we were in a bathroom, partaking of a substance. Mary just plopped down on the toilet and took a wiz, right in front of everyone. I can promise you how Mary would receive some drunk kid trying to grab her azz would be totally different than others. Kids do inappropriate things. Doesn't make them a rapist or sexual predator. Slice went to highschool with me. I'm sure he could recount some of the things that went down. It was freaking pandamonium.