Kavanaugh Confirmation

It's interesting. The Dems in the forum are asking for a full hearing and airing of facts to try to get to the truth. The Republicans here have already decided the women are lying having heard no facts.

Even more interesting?

The fact DiFi sat on the original claim for six weeks when it should have been heard.

Even more interesting than that?

The timing on these latest two allegations.

Or you could substitute the word "suspicious" for interesting.
 
So to recap:

1) Ford (original allegations): we'll hear from her tomorrow.
2) Ramirez: no one including people she named can corroborate her story and she expressed doubts herself.
3) Avenatti's client: restraining order, tax leans, prior relationship with Katz (Ford attorney), outrageous claims.
4) Yacht rape: oops, let's forget we brought that up.

Back to Ford v Kavanaugh it seems to me.
Pretty good breakdown.

Were the last 3 on standby to give Ford time to get to DC?
 
So to recap:

1) Ford (original allegations): we'll hear from her tomorrow.
2) Ramirez: no one including people she named can corroborate her story and she expressed doubts herself.
3) Avenatti's client: restraining order, tax leans, prior relationship with Katz (Ford attorney), outrageous claims.
4) Yacht rape: oops, let's forget we brought that up.

Back to Ford v Kavanaugh it seems to me.

Assault (rough handling) of girl in 98.. 4 witnesses, 2 willing to corroborate.

*I see this is a repost
 
It's interesting. The Dems in the forum are asking for a full hearing and airing of facts to try to get to the truth. The Republicans here have already decided the women are lying having heard no facts.
The democrats don't care. They just want to push the vote till after midterms. There will just be more ridiculous demands on how proceedings should go and further delay.

Had this allegation been made weeks ago there would have been time for investigation and a vote. Or possibly Trump could have just pulled Kavanaugh and named someone else.

But that's not what the democrats want.
 
Assault (rough handling) of girl in 98.. 4 witnesses, 2 willing to corroborate.

*I see this is a repost
😂😂😂

Kavanaugh, to investigators, rejects anonymous 1998 assault claim: 'It's ridiculous. Total Twilight Zone.'

Kavanaugh was asked specifically about a new claim in a letter received by Sen. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., from an anonymous individual apparently in Denver, alleging that Kavanaugh "shoved" someone up against a wall "very aggressively and sexually" during an outing in front of four witnesses. Gardner's office received the letter on Sept. 22.

"We're dealing with an anonymous letter about an anonymous person and an anonymous friend," Kavanaugh said. "It's ridiculous. Total Twilight Zone. And no, I've never done anything like that."
 
Assault (rough handling) of girl in 98.. 4 witnesses, 2 willing to corroborate.

Do we take this one serious? This is one the Dems are saying was planted.

Also not only not from a direct witness, the author was speaking for a supposed witness to the allegation.

Let's throw it in the pile anyway. I still say we're down to Ford v Kavanaugh.
 
How on earth did I miss that!
DoDyIkPUYAAIYJL
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
Do we take this one serious? This is one the Dems are saying was planted.

Also not only not from a direct witness, the author was speaking for a supposed witness to the allegation.

Let's throw it in the pile anyway. I still say we're down to Ford v Kavanaugh.
Actually you’re down to Ford v Kavanaugh, Judge, Smythe, and Keyser who have all said “Nope!” in interviews.
 
But it's not anonymous, two of the four wished to be anonymous. Kavanaugh was supposedly dating one of them.
Yes. It is anonymous. There is no follow up path

The committee also released a copy of the unsigned letter. In a statement, committee spokesperson Taylor Foy told Fox News, "We have no reason to assign the letter credibility, and even if we did, we’d have no way to investigate the allegation as it was made anonymously and cannot be corroborated.
 
Do we take this one serious? This is one the Dems are saying was planted.

Also not only not from a direct witness, the author was speaking for a supposed witness to the allegation.

Let's throw it in the pile anyway. I still say we're down to Ford v Kavanaugh.

I don't know, honestly. I only heard 2 of the 4 were down to talk, maybe more I haven't heard.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top