Kavanaugh Confirmation

#5,929
#5,929
Stew Cook said:
But it's not anonymous, two of the four wished to be anonymous. Kavanaugh was supposedly dating one of them.
Click to expand...

As of now it's anonymous. Avenatti has also promised he has people to back up his client's story but they'll only talk to the FBI - which I take to mean, we won't be hearing from them. If an FBI investigation was ordered I'm betting those sources suddenly decline. They are unnamed - the press can't even try to talk to them.
 
#5,930
#5,930
volinbham said:
Do we take this one serious? This is one the Dems are saying was planted.

Also not only not from a direct witness, the author was speaking for a supposed witness to the allegation.

Let's throw it in the pile anyway. I still say we're down to Ford v Kavanaugh.
Click to expand...

So, both Ramirez and Swetnick have offered to testify tomorrow. That's not going to be allowed, though.

So, yeah just Ford.
 
#5,934
#5,934
volinbham said:
As of now it's anonymous. Avenatti has also promised he has people to back up his client's story but they'll only talk to the FBI - which I take to mean, we won't be hearing from them. If an FBI investigation was ordered I'm betting those sources suddenly decline. They are unnamed - the press can't even try to talk to them.
Click to expand...

Yeah.. That might be a dead-end. Seems so.
 
#5,936
#5,936
Stew Cook said:
I don't know, honestly. I only heard 2 of the 4 were down to talk, maybe more I haven't heard.
Click to expand...

I really hope you're just stirring discussion with your comments as of late. I'd hate to think you've gone full idiot and are buying into all this nonsense.
 
#5,937
#5,937
zeppelin128 said:
If folks start looking at our posts on VN we are all going down together. Gameday threads alone will result in mass incarceration in mental institutions.
Click to expand...

I was on a BMW board that had a politics forum. It was flipped from here - more left than right. One of the posters made it known he was running for some municipal or state office (he was a right poster). Lo and behold, someone (or ones) from the board shared select posts from that guy (can't recall if with the the opposition or the local press). They were used against him.

Word of caution :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#5,942
#5,942
volinbham said:
I was on a BMW board that had a politics forum. It was flipped from here - more left than right. One of the posters made it known he was running for some municipal or state office (he was a right poster). Lo and behold, someone (or ones) from the board shared select posts from that guy (can't recall if with the the opposition or the local press). They were used against him.

Word of caution :)
Click to expand...
I could never run for office then, the board has called me a Marxist Communist pig too many times.
 
#5,943
#5,943
volinbham said:
I was on a BMW board that had a politics forum. It was flipped from here - more left than right. One of the posters made it known he was running for some municipal or state office (he was a right poster). Lo and behold, someone (or ones) from the board shared select posts from that guy (can't recall if with the the opposition or the local press). They were used against him.

Word of caution :)
Click to expand...
Who in hell would run for office?
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
#5,944
#5,944
Grand Vol said:
I really hope you're just stirring discussion with your comments as of late. I'd hate to think you've gone full idiot and are buying into all this nonsense.
Click to expand...

Some yes, some no. The task was to consolidate a running list of accusations.

I really would like to hear these people backup what they are saying.
 
#5,946
#5,946
tim said:
How convenient that you choose to ignore the timing and obvious tactical weaponizing of sexual assault allegations from over 3 decades ago. How about enough of this bullsh
Click to expand...

Love this response (and all the others) to my point. Each of you admits my point.

You have decided on the truth having actually heard no facts.
 
#5,947
#5,947
On Ramirez testifying.

Deborah Ramirez's lawyer: She might be willing to testify at the hearing, even without an FBI investigation

Clune claimed to Anderson Cooper last night that the majority party had been playing “games” with him over the last few days about Ramirez’s testimony. Take two minutes to read this Twitter threat by WSJ columnist Kimberley Strassel and consider which side is playing games. Strassel says she’s seen the emails between Grassley’s staff and Ramirez’s lawyers and counts no fewer than six invitations from Republicans in the span of 48 hours for Ramirez to provide some sort of statement to the Committee about what Kavanaugh allegedly did to her, to get the ball rolling on possible testimony. Somehow her legal team managed to duck all six requests, at one point reportedly telling Republicans to read the New Yorker story if they want her statement. If Ramirez wants to testify, why not just submit a statement on Monday? If she doesn’t want to testify, why not just say that?
Click to expand...
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top