NurseGoodVol
Middle…ish
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- Messages
- 14,647
- Likes
- 26,761
I agree with your base statement. It wasn't going to change anything.Wouldn't you want any congressman/woman to give any alleged criminal activity to the proper authorities to follow up? She really shouldn't have come out publicly with this and it blew up in her face. It wasn't going to move the needle in her favor with the inevitable confirmation. Did she actually think a GOP member in congress would change their mind. lol. that is funny and pathetic at the same time.
Trolling tips
1 know very little about what the subject is.
2 pick a personal insult that applies to person you are trolling.
3 if that insult doesn't work try several others until you find a hot spot
4 hammer them mercilessly on their weakness
5 insult their intelligence
6 insult their appearence ( even though you have no idea what they look like)
7 claim moral superiority
8 pity them or say well bless your little heart
9 if this all fails refer back to 1 and actually learn something about the subject being discussed.
Does that about cover it grand?
Wouldn't you want any congressman/woman to give any alleged criminal activity to the proper authorities to follow up? She really shouldn't have come out publicly with this and it blew up in her face. It wasn't going to move the needle in her favor with the inevitable confirmation. Did she actually think a GOP member in congress would change their mind. lol. that is funny and pathetic at the same time.
If this allegation of rape is true, he should be immediately voted down. However, I'm not seeing enough to show proof, the FBI has passed on it as well, a couple times actually. There are plenty of other reasons to vote against his nomination. Not sure this should factor into it as it stands.
I don't think there is anything to this honestly. The timing is very suspect to say the least. Political stunt.It is not an allegation of rape. At absolute worst it would be attempted rape but doesn't sound like that's what's being alleged either.
You do inadvertently point out the problem though - with no real information in the public, new "facts" are created.



Lol. You mean that thing that is often inadmissible in court? Not sure how many women/democrats/crazy people you know but if people keep telling themselves the same lie over and over they will eventually believe it. I refer you to one of the many Russian collusion threads for examples.Well someone is lying. One has taken a polygraph.