Kavanaugh Confirmation

Would be applicable in a court.
That's why the Dems are going for it. They know there's no way in hell this could hold up in court. A claim made a out an incident 35 years ago between 2 minors. Named witnesses dispute the claims, and the accusers haven't even filed a police report. But all they need is a bunch of their idiot minions like you to get whipped up in a frenzy and hope it can sway public sentiment. Sad!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1972 Grad
Is this Christine Ford driving to Washington D.C.?
car-driving-clipart-8.gif
 
That's why the Dems are going for it. They know there's no way in hell this could hold up in court. A claim made a out an incident 35 years ago between 2 minors. Named witnesses dispute the claims, and the accusers haven't even filed a police report. But all they need is a bunch of their idiot minions like you to get whipped up in a frenzy and hope it can sway public sentiment. Sad!
I really don't give a sh!t what the dems do. Not giving Obama's pick a vote and trying to ram this through. I don't care how cheap and deplorable you think this stunt is.
 
I don’t really want to have to “believe” an accuser or the accused. I would hope that the #MeToo movement makes it easier for women to use our current criminal justice system to seek the justice they deserve.

As it stands now, we are seeing the #BelieveSurvivors movement take hold which completely circumvents the justice system and leaves us with “I believe her because she’s telling the truth.”

This is an underrated post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
I think they should clear the room, no one allowed in but Ford. There should be a microphone and a camera. She shows up at 9am and talks until she’s finished. No questions, no nothing.

Then they confirm him the next day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
I think they should clear the room, no one allowed in but Ford. There should be a microphone and a camera. She shows up at 9am and talks until she’s finished. No questions, no nothing.

Then they confirm him the next day.
I think they should eat breakfast during her testimony and just occasionally nod.
 
They listed 2 people who disagreed with the characterization (not counting Roche who had commented earlier). Two! Honestly these pieces are absolutely nuts. Also mentioned in the story are several people that counter the narrative of him being a black out or belligerent drunk.
Welcome to the news in 2018. All you need are two or three tweets in a country of 330M and you get to write “outrage over X” for your clickbait headline.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top