Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#8,353
#8,353
whodeycin85 said:
I edited.. With actual citation to my work . Please respond in the same manner if not capable do not respond
I'll ever repost so you don't have to go back.

FD-302s are protected by privacy and grand jury rules
A. Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a)
Limits how federal agencies can release personal information about individuals.
§ 552a(b): “No agency shall disclose any record…without the written consent of the individual to whom the record pertains, unless disclosure is pursuant to…statutory authority.”
Courts interpret this to protect uncharged individuals named in law-enforcement files (which includes 302s).
Even if Congress passes a law, forcing release violates privacy rights unless those individuals consent, and retroactive violations would be unconstitutional under due process principles.
Click to expand...

The private act is a congressional act, which means it can be revoked, destroyed or edited. (so what does that have to do with anything?)

Even if Congress passes a law, forcing release violates privacy rights unless those individuals consent, and retroactive violations would be unconstitutional under due process principles.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Sure they can, which is why if you FOIA say a closed Trump or Hunter Biden case, they will hand over the 302s.
 
#8,356
#8,356
whodeycin85 said:
I've cited the law and provision regarding 302.... And why Congress can not legislate their release... Can you cite me to the contrary?
Click to expand...

No, you cite the Privacy Act which was created by Congress, which can be revoked, superseded, destroyed or edited by Congress. Even if Congress had not passed the Epstein Transparency Act, one should be able to FOIA all the 302s as a generalization.

You don't understand even basic 7th grade civics.
 
#8,358
#8,358
LSU-SIU said:
The private act is a congressional act, which means it can be revoked, destroyed or edited. (so what does that have to do with anything?)
Click to expand...
In theory that would eliminate 1 barrier.. You still have the foia exemption and grand jury secrecy...
LSU-SIU said:
Sure they can, which is why if you FOIA say a closed Trump or Hunter Biden case, they will hand over the 302s.
Click to expand...
Because they were offset of the public court records..
 
#8,359
#8,359
LSU-SIU said:
No, you cite the Privacy Act which was created by Congress, which can be revoked, superseded, destroyed or edited by Congress. Even if Congress had not passed the Epstein Transparency Act, one should be able to FOIA all the 302s as a generalization.

You don't understand even basic 7th grade civics.
Click to expand...
You telling me this while giving me a made to scenario about revoked they privacy act ... I'm giving too cited precedent and legal precedent... Really?? That's what your going with .. Are we dealing with laws and facts or your opinion of what you want to happen .
 
#8,360
#8,360
whodeycin85 said:
In theory that would eliminate 1 barrier.. You still have the foia exemption and grand jury secrecy...

Because they were offset of the public court records..
Click to expand...

The Epstein Transparency Act specifies the law, the Executive branch can make sure it doesn't jeopardize an investigation but in this case there are no investigations. The Privacy Act is of no use here as this is separate law that covers the disclosures revolving around Epstein.
 
#8,361
#8,361
utvolpj said:
A judge ruled on it in December. They can be released per the Epstein transparency act
Click to expand...
He did but the doesn't cover all 302s surrounding the Epstien files.. It specific trusted to the Maxwell and Epstein cases... Others who have been alleged are protected under the statues I provided.
 
#8,362
#8,362
whodeycin85 said:
You telling me this while giving me a made to scenario about revoked they privacy act ... I'm giving too cited precedent and legal precedent... Really?? That's what your going with .. Are we dealing with laws and facts or your opinion of what you want to happen .
Click to expand...

Congress has already ordered the Executive branch what to do, the Privacy Act has nothing to do with it unless one is filing a FOIA at this stage. But even under FOIA most of these documents would need to be handed over.
 
#8,363
#8,363
LSU-SIU said:
Congress has already ordered the Executive branch what to do, the Privacy Act has nothing to do with it unless one is filing a FOIA at this stage. But even under FOIA most of these documents would need to be handed over.
Click to expand...
They ordered to release sealed documents etc involved in the Epstien and Maxwell cases...302 regarding others are protected... Even from fioa... Don't like the law vote to change it.. But you didn't vote
 
#8,365
#8,365
whodeycin85 said:
They ordered to release sealed documents etc involved in the Epstien and Maxwell cases...302 regarding others are protected... Even from fioa... Don't like the law vote to change it.. But you didn't vote
Click to expand...
Why do you keep bringing up foia? It has nothing to do with the law passed and being violated by Trump admin
 
#8,366
#8,366
whodeycin85 said:
They ordered to release sealed documents etc involved in the Epstien and Maxwell cases...302 regarding others are protected... Even from fioa... Don't like the law vote to change it.. But you didn't vote
Click to expand...

No, Congress has ordered any documents, investigations, and information as it "relates to" them.

Don't like the law vote to change it..
Click to expand...


They basically did just that, see Epstein Transparency Act. 😂
 
#8,370
#8,370
whodeycin85 said:
Would you be happy if the they were baked in you by some one that the FBI said if mentally unstable??
Click to expand...
can you reword the question? I am not sure what you are asking.

*tongue in cheek* I would not be happy with anyone being baked inside me.
 
#8,371
#8,371
Vol8188 said:
Why would Epstein interview and incriminate himself?
Click to expand...

Well, I would have thought you were at least bright enough to know they would have had to interview other people, I was wrong.

69dff62cbcaf2e39b178811c8c46c41d.jpg
 
#8,373
#8,373
LouderVol said:
can you reword the question? I am not sure what you are asking.

*tongue in cheek* I would not be happy with anyone being baked inside me.
Click to expand...
Sorry missed that.. Basically is a person deemed crazy accused you without proof would that be acceptable to you?
 
#8,374
#8,374
Ttucke11 said:
What is it about Israel that makes some people lose every ounce of logical thought in their brain?
Click to expand...

So you have zero evidence and when asked your plan is just to say anyone who disagree with you is incapable of logic?

Solid plan.
 
#8,375
#8,375
allstar34 said:
Ghislaine Maxwell, his Chief of Recruitment is behind bars right? She was the main connector for his operation.
Click to expand...
Ghislaine recruited middle school and high school girls in Florida and then paid those girls that they were already preying on to recruit new victims.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top