Iran

Any bunker has to have an entry. You don’t have to have the capability of striking something at a specific depth, if you can simply make it inaccessible.
True.

But... I think it's far more easy to have hidden entrances than it is to have bomb strikes by the United States on multiple entryways. It's pretty much like whack-a-mole. But there are bunches and bunches of moles.

We only have a very limited supply of the biggest bunker busters.
 
True.

But... I think it's far more easy to have hidden entrances than it is to have bomb strikes by the United States on multiple entryways. It's pretty much like whack-a-mole. But there are bunches and bunches of moles.

We only have a very limited supply of the biggest bunker busters.

Their regime can’t afford to continually play whack a mole. They’ll be out if they try it.

That’s why all the Russian simps have been showing up in this thread. Losing Iran would be a massive blow to Russia.
 
Their regime can’t afford to continually play whack a mole. They’ll be out if they try it.

That’s why all the Russian simps have been showing up in this thread. Losing Iran would be a massive blow to Russia.
There's also been a strong, irrational presence in the Venezuela thread, which was another massive blow. Orange man bad, bloody dictators good, Comrades.

Russian Bots:
1768658086165.png
 
Late dropping this but…


A picture, not a link, was provided claiming a quote was made. The most obvious way to settle this is to provide a direct link to the quote.

ETA: and the smooth brain who posted just above me is guilty of this all the time. As is pacer in this example.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top